Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,771 questions · 10,185 findings · 893 reviews

No studies found 2,109 · 20.7%GRADE not reported 1,125 · 11%Very low 2,279 · 22.4%Low 2,514 · 24.7%Moderate 1,709 · 16.8%High 449 · 4.4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Sclerotherapy vs no intervention

Serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of gastric varices · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

It is very uncertain whether sclerotherapy changes serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sclerotherapy vs no intervention

Serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of bleeding from gastric varices · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

It is very uncertain whether sclerotherapy changes serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sclerotherapy vs no intervention

Oesophageal variceal bleeding · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

It is very uncertain whether sclerotherapy changes oesophageal variceal bleeding compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care vs electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care

Global state: clinically important change in global state · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care changes global state: clinically important change assessed by: number of… compared with electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care vs electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care

Adverse effects: clinically important adverse effectsassessed by: number of participants with a delayed memory deficitStudy duration: 4 weeks · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care changes adverse effects: clinically important adverse effectsassessed by:… compared with electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care vs electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care

Dropout · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care changes leaving the study early: any reasonassessed by: number of dropouts… compared with electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Combined antiretroviral therapy (post-cART) vs Pre-cART (same children, before therapy)

Oral candidiasis prevalence · Children and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH)

Oral candidiasis prevalence fell significantly after cART compared with before cART in the same children (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

Overall survival · advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival · advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma

It is very uncertain whether chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy changes progression‐free survival compared with chemotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

Serious adverse events · advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma

It is very uncertain whether chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy changes serious adverse events compared with chemotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

Tumour response · advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma

It is very uncertain whether chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy changes tumour response rate compared with chemotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

Any adverse events · advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy showed no clear difference in any adverse events compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival (PSF) · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with radiotherapy showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival Median compared with radiotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review