Cochrane · systematic review · CD011573

Sclerotherapy versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

Gattini, D, Cifuentes, LI, Torres-Robles, R, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library

Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 12.5%Ungraded 1 · 12.5%Very low 6 · 75%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Sclerotherapy compared to no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

Population: primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
All‐cause mortality
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention
RR 1.04 [0.44, 2.5]1 study · 108 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention
RR 0.46 [0.26, 0.83]1 study · 108 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of congestive hypertensive gastropathy
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention
RR 2.48 [0.69, 8.84]1 study · 108 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of gastric varices
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention
RR 1.11 [0.36, 3.43]1 study · 108 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of bleeding from gastric varices
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention
RR 6.51 [0.34, 123.06]1 study · 108 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Health‐related quality of life
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oesophageal variceal bleeding
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention
RR 0.13 [0.04, 0.42]1 study · 108 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Non‐serious adverse events
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention
no estimate extracted1 study · 108 participantsUngraded