Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,554 questions in 140 reviews · Heart

current versions
No studies 272 · 17.5%Ungraded 44 · 2.8%Very low 329 · 21.2%Low 464 · 29.9%Moderate 319 · 20.5%High 126 · 8.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs active comparators
Depression, change from baseline · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Meditation for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 595 participantsModerate
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs active comparators
Perceived stress, change from baseline · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Meditation for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 357 participantsModerate
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs active comparators
Well‐being · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Meditation for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 63 participantsLow
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs active comparators
Adverse events · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Meditation for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs active comparators
Smoking cessation · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Meditation for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.45 [0.78, 2.68]6 studies · 1087 participantsLow
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo
Apixaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 8638 participantsModerate
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo
Rivaroxaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 21870 participantsHigh
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo
Dabigatran (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1861 participantsLow
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo
Apixaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 8638 participantsModerate
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo
Rivaroxaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 21870 participantsModerate
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo
Dabigatran (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1861 participantsLow
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo
Apixaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 8544 participantsHigh
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo
Rivaroxaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 21870 participantsHigh
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo
Dabigatran (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after acute myocardial infarction: a network… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1861 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
Daily fluid balance in millilitres (measured from admission to discharge) · adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 169 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
Net weight loss (measured from admission to discharge) · adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 497 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
All‐cause mortality (from admission to discharge) · adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.53 [0.81, 2.9]5 studies · 530 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
Cardiovascular mortality ‐ not measured · adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
Length of hospital stay (from admission to discharge) · adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 211 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
Readmission to hospital following discharge · adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.63, 1.16]3 studies · 400 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
Acute kidney injury (adverse event) (from admission to discharge) · adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.7, 1.49]3 studies · 491 participantsLow
Psychological intervention vs usual care
Change in depression score ( · adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease
Psychological interventions for depression in adolescent and adult congenital heart disease (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 156 participantsLow
Psychological intervention vs usual care
Change in depression score ( · adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease
Psychological interventions for depression in adolescent and adult congenital heart disease (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 287 participantsLow
Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation
Total mortality Number of deaths · Patients with heart disease
Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.19 [0.65, 2.16]12 studies · 1647 participantsLow
Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation
Exercise capacity ≤ 12 months* · Patients with heart disease
Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted24 studies · 2343 participantsModerate
Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation
Withdrawal from the exercise programme Number of completers (participants with data at · Patients with heart disease
Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.99, 1.08]23 studies · 2638 participantsLow
Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation
HRQoLValidated measures of HRQoL (e.g. Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36), Sickness Impact Profile, Nottingham Health Profile) · Patients with heart disease
Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted18 studies · 2207 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Limited sternotomy vs full sternotomy
Mortality · adults undergoing aortic valve replacement
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.45, 1.94]10 studies · 985 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Limited sternotomy vs full sternotomy
Cardiopulmonary bypass time (minutes) · adults undergoing aortic valve replacement
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 1043 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Limited sternotomy vs full sternotomy
Aortic cross‐clamp time (minutes) · adults undergoing aortic valve replacement
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted12 studies · 1235 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Limited sternotomy vs full sternotomy
Postoperative blood loss (mL) · adults undergoing aortic valve replacement
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 767 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Limited sternotomy vs full sternotomy
Pain scores, measured in various ways at a median of 2 days' · adults undergoing aortic valve replacement
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 649 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Limited sternotomy vs full sternotomy
Quality of life, · adults undergoing aortic valve replacement
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 624 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Limited sternotomy vs full sternotomy
Index admission costs · adults undergoing aortic valve replacement
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 492 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Peak IL‐6 (between the end of surgery and 24 hours post‐surgery)
Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted152 studies · 6485 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Peak IL‐8 (between the end of surgery and 6 hours post‐surgery)
Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted72 studies · 2963 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Hospital or 30‐day mortality
Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.78 [0.68, 0.91]190 studies · 24817 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Myocardial injury (hospital stay)
Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.95, 1.14]86 studies · 23118 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Kidney injury (safety outcome) (hospital stay)
Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.96, 1.16]79 studies · 23103 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Surgical Site Infection (hospital stay)
Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.83, 1.01]40 studies · 19368 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Duration of hospital length of stay
Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted148 studies · 15547 participantsVery low
Class I and/or III antiarrhythmics vs control
Outcomes at > 3 to 6 months after ablation · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation
Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Class I antiarrhythmics vs control
Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation
Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.54 [0.25, 1.19]1 study · 125 participantsLow
Class I antiarrhythmics vs control
Adverse events: thromboembolic events · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation
Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Class I antiarrhythmics vs control
Adverse events: myocardial infarction · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation
Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Class I antiarrhythmics vs control
Adverse events: new diagnosis of heart failure · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation
Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Class I antiarrhythmics vs control
Adverse events: requirement for 1 or more hospitalisations for atrial tachyarrhythmia · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation
Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 participantsUngraded
Class I antiarrhythmics vs control
All‐cause mortality · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation
Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Class I antiarrhythmics vs control
Requirement for 1 or more repeat ablation · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation
Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 participantsUngraded
Class III antiarrhythmics vs control
Outcomes at > 3 to 6 months after ablation · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation
Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies