Cochrane · systematic review · CD014811

Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure

Rasoul, D, Zhang, J, Farnell, E, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

HeartAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 14.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 42.9%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics compared to bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics for adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure

Population: adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Daily fluid balance in millilitres (measured from admission to discharge)
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
no estimate extracted2 studies · 169 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Net weight loss (measured from admission to discharge)
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
no estimate extracted5 studies · 497 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
All‐cause mortality (from admission to discharge)
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
RR 1.53 [0.81, 2.9]5 studies · 530 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Cardiovascular mortality ‐ not measured
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Length of hospital stay (from admission to discharge)
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
no estimate extracted4 studies · 211 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Readmission to hospital following discharge
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
RR 0.85 [0.63, 1.16]3 studies · 400 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Acute kidney injury (adverse event) (from admission to discharge)
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics
RR 1.02 [0.7, 1.49]3 studies · 491 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision