evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,288 questions · 3,354 findings · 516 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 720 · 21.5%GRADE not reported 164 · 4.9%Very low 950 · 28.3%Low 932 · 27.8%Moderate 434 · 12.9%High 154 · 4.6%

Amphotericin B deoxycholate vs liposomal amphotericin B: effects on kidney function

Increase in SCr level: ≥ two‐fold from baseline level SCr level (mg/dL) · patients in treatment with amphotericin B

Amphotericin B deoxycholate probably leads to lower increase in SCr level: ≥ two‐fold from baseline level SCr level… compared with liposomal amphotericin B: effects on kidney function (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training

Trauma due to shoulder dystocia (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome)

Simulation‐based obstetric team training showed no clear difference in trauma due to shoulder dystocia (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) compared with no training (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training

Cesarean delivery (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome)

Simulation‐based obstetric team training probably leads to lower cesarean delivery (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) compared with no training (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual vs quality of gastric residual alone

Number of infants with feed interruption episodes (lasting ≥ 12 hours) · feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual changes number of infants with feed interruption episodes (lasting ≥ 12 hours) compared with quality of gastric residual alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual vs quality of gastric residual alone

Risk of invasive Infection · feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual showed no clear difference in risk of invasive Infection compared with quality of gastric residual alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual vs quality of gastric residual alone

Mortality before hospital discharge · feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality before hospital discharge compared with quality of gastric residual alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual vs quality of gastric residual alone

Risk of necrotising enterocolitis stage ≥ 2 · feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual showed no clear difference in risk of necrotising enterocolitis stage ≥ 2 compared with quality of gastric residual alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review