Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training: Low Apgar score
Simulation‐based obstetric team training showed no clear difference in low Apgar score (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) compared with no training (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training Low Apgar score (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) Simulation‐based obstetric team training showed no clear difference in low Apgar score (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) compared with no training (low certainty). Multi‐professional simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.99 [0.85, 1.15] | 2 studies · 115171 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi‐professional simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and trainees' performance 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.