Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

317 questions · 322 findings · 62 reviews · Eyes and Vision

No studies found 94 · 29.2%GRADE not reported 15 · 4.7%Very low 63 · 19.6%Low 91 · 28.3%Moderate 45 · 14%High 14 · 4.3%

Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Mean quality of life or visual function (measured using Visual Function Index‐14 tool) (1 year) · participants (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

LipiFlow vs thermostatic devices

Mean change from baseline in meibomian gland expression scores at 1 to 4 weeks (higher is favored) · people with dry eye

LipiFlow showed no clear difference in mean change from baseline in meibomian gland expression scores at 1… compared with thermostatic devices (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without pan‐retinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP alone

Presence of vitreous haemorrhaged · proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without… probably leads to lower presence of vitreous haemorrhaged compared with PRP alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Symblepharon Presence of symblepharon · people with severe acute ocular burns

The intervention showed no clear difference in symblepharon Presence of symblepharon (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Symblepharon Presence of symblepharon · people with moderate acute ocular burns

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes symblepharon Presence of symblepharon (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review