Cochrane · systematic review · CD012648
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia
Zamora-de La Cruz, D, Bartlett, J, Gutierrez, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 28.6%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 5 · 71.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Show all 2 versionsTrifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia
Population: people (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (LogMAR (1 year) Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 107 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mean uncorrected near visual acuity (LogMAR) (1 year) Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 107 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mean uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (LogMAR) (1 year) Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 107 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mean best‐corrected distance acuity (LogMAR) (1 year) Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 107 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mean contrast sensitivity (1 year) Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Mean quality of life or visual function (measured using Visual Function Index‐14 tool) (1 year) Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Adverse events (1 year) Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 129 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |