Parental self‐harm ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Parent‐child relationship or assessment of parenting · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Parenting skills; postintervention · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Receptive L2 proximal vocabulary (understanding of words taught in the intervention) · second language (L2) learners up to six years of age
1 finding from 1 review
Receptive L2 distal vocabulary (understanding of words not included in the intervention) · second language (L2) learners up to six years of age
1 finding from 1 review
Expressive L2 proximal vocabulary (expressing or producing words taught in the intervention) · second language (L2) learners up to six years of age
1 finding from 1 review
Expressive L2 distal vocabulary (expressing or producing words not taught in the intervention) · second language (L2) learners up to six years of age
1 finding from 1 review
Substance use ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
Summary of findings table ‐ Psychological interventions showed no clear difference in substance use ‐ post‐interventiong compared with inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Parent relationship quality ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Parental self‐harm ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Parent‐child relationship or assessment of parenting · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Psychological interventions changes parent–child relationship ‐ post‐interventionm compared with inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Parenting skills; postintervention · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Trauma‐related symptoms ‐ post‐interventionb · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Psychological wellbeing ‐ post‐interventiond · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review
Cognitive and neurobehavioural outcomes · children (aged 0–2 years)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · children (aged 0–2 years)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Floor dust ‐ hard floor (continuous) Floor dust lead levels Scale from: 0 to 40 · children (aged 0–2 years)
1 finding from 1 review
Age at introduction of complementary foods Measurement: proportion participants with event · children of complementary feeding age
Educational intervention probably leads to lower age at introduction of complementary foods Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stunting · children of complementary feeding age
Educational intervention showed no clear difference in nutritional status: stunting (H/LAZ ≤ −2 SD) Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wasting · children of complementary feeding age
Educational intervention showed no clear difference in nutritional status: wasting (WH/LZ ≤ −2 SD) Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review