Summary of findings table ‐ Psychological interventions vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist): Substance use ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Psychological interventions showed no clear difference in substance use ‐ post‐interventiong compared with inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist) (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Psychological interventions vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist) Substance use ‐ post‐interventiong · parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood Summary of findings table ‐ Psychological interventions showed no clear difference in substance use ‐ post‐interventiong compared with inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist) (low certainty). Interventions from pregnancy to two years after birth for parents experiencing complex post‐traumatic stress… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.57 [0.72, 3.45] | 1 study · 189 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions from pregnancy to two years after birth for parents experiencing complex post‐traumatic stress disorder and/or with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.