Educational intervention vs no educational intervention: Age at introduction of complementary foods Measurement: proportion participants with event
Educational intervention probably leads to lower age at introduction of complementary foods Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Educational intervention vs no educational intervention Age at introduction of complementary foods Measurement: proportion participants with event · children of complementary feeding age Educational intervention probably leads to lower age at introduction of complementary foods Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (moderate certainty). Educational interventions for improving primary caregiver complementary feeding practices for children aged… (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.88 [0.83, 0.94] | 4 studies · 1738 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Educational interventions for improving primary caregiver complementary feeding practices for children aged 24 months and under 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.