Marginal bone level (first bone to implant contact, FBIC) · Adults (18 years or older) with one missing tooth in the aesthetic zone needing an implant-supported single crown
Metal-free implant-supported single crowns (zirconia veneered with… showed no clear difference in marginal bone level (first bone to implant contact, FBIC) compared with metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns; GRADE not reported.
4 findings from 1 review
MD -0.01 [-0.93, 0.91]
1 study · 18 participants
GRADE not reported
MD -0.03 [-0.42, 0.36]
1 study · 18 participants
GRADE not reported
MD -0.18 [-0.89, 0.53]
1 study · 18 participants
GRADE not reported
Show 1 more finding
Patient satisfaction (measured by patient satisfaction or aesthetic scales) · Adults (18 years or older) with one missing tooth in the aesthetic zone needing an implant-supported single crown
It is very uncertain whether metal-free implant-supported single crowns (zirconia veneered with… changes aesthetic evaluation (patient satisfaction VAS) compared with metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Aesthetics · Adults (18 years or older) with one missing tooth in the aesthetic zone needing an implant-supported single crown
It is very uncertain whether metal-free implant-supported single crowns (zirconia veneered with… changes aesthetic evaluation (pink and white aesthetic score, PES and WES… compared with metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Implant crown failure · Adults (18 years or older) with one missing tooth in the aesthetic zone needing an implant-supported single crown
1 finding from 1 review
Implant crown complications · Adults (18 years or older) with one missing tooth in the aesthetic zone needing an implant-supported single crown
It is very uncertain whether metal-free implant-supported single crowns (zirconia veneered with… changes implant crown complications compared with metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ceramic inlays (all types) vs Composite resin inlay
Outcome not reported · Adults who require restorative treatment in posterior teeth
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Ceramic inlays (all types) vs Amalgam
Outcome not reported · Adults who require restorative treatment in posterior teeth
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Aesthetic satisfaction (colour match) · Adults who require restorative treatment in posterior teeth
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative sensitivity · Adults who require restorative treatment in posterior teeth
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative sensitivity was evaluated 1 week after placement. No teeth with ceramic inlays were found to have postoperative sensitivity, while one tooth with gold inlay presented sensitivity, which lasted more than 2…
1 study · 20 participants
GRADE not reported
Failure rate (longevity) at 5 years · Adults who require restorative treatment in posterior teeth
Ceramic inlays (all types) showed no clear difference in failure rate (longevity) at 5 years compared with gold inlay; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Ceramic inlays (all types) vs Composite resin (direct restoration)
Outcome not reported · Adults who require restorative treatment in posterior teeth
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Exacerbation of ulcerative colitis · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Celecoxib showed no clear difference in exacerbation of ulcerative colitis compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
CERA Q4W · CKD patients (any stage) treated for anaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
CERA higher dose · CKD patients (any stage) treated for anaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Overall success rate · Patients receiving implant-supported single crowns / short-span FDPs
1 finding from 1 review
Andersson 2003: 94% (16/17) ceramic vs 100% (12/12) titanium; Andersson 2001: 93% (28/30) ceramic vs 100% (35/35) titanium; no statistical analysis provided; no measurable / non-significant differences in alveolar bone…
2 studies · 107 participants
GRADE not reported
Success / prosthetic complications (4 years) · Patients with single-tooth implant crowns; split-mouth, 4-year
1 finding from 1 review
100% success, no prosthetic complications, and a similar loss of marginal bone (0.4 mm) in both groups (narrative)
1 study · 20 participants
GRADE not reported
Cost of the intervention · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Patient satisfaction / quality of life (validated measure) · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Catastrophic failure of the restored tooth or restoration leading directly to extraction · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
1 finding from 1 review
SoF 'Catastrophic failure of restoration': assumed risk (conventional filling) 0, corresponding risk (single crown) 0; no events in either group so a relative effect was not estimable; 117 participants (1 study); GRADE…
1 study · 117 participants
Very low
Periodontal health status · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review