Question · asked by 1 review
Ceramic inlays (all types) vs Gold inlay: Aesthetic satisfaction (colour match)
- Population
- Adults who require restorative treatment in posterior teeth
- Intervention
- Ceramic inlays (all types)
- Comparison
- Gold inlay
- Outcome
- Aesthetic satisfaction (colour match)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Ceramic inlays (all types) vs Gold inlay Aesthetic satisfaction (colour match) · Adults who require restorative treatment in posterior teeth The review found no eligible studies for this question. Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth (2003) · Cochrane All outcomes | Information on aesthetic satisfaction could not be obtained from this study as it did not use the tooth-coloured restorations as the control group. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth 2003 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2001 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.