Question · asked by 1 review
Metal-free implant-supported single crowns (zirconia veneered with feldspathic ceramic) vs Metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns: Implant crown failure
- Population
- Adults (18 years or older) with one missing tooth in the aesthetic zone needing an implant-supported single crown
- Intervention
- Metal-free implant-supported single crowns (zirconia veneered with feldspathic ceramic)
- Comparison
- Metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns
- Outcome
- Implant crown failure
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Metal-free implant-supported single crowns (zirconia veneered with feldspathic ceramic) vs Metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns Implant crown failure · Adults (18 years or older) with one missing tooth in the aesthetic zone needing an implant-supported single crown · 12 and 24 months Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes | At 12 and 24 months 18 participants were available. No failure was reported for the test or control groups at either 12 or 24 months. | 1 study · 18 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-05 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.