evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,534 questions · 5,247 findings · 456 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 1,142 · 21.8%GRADE not reported 1,503 · 28.6%Very low 1,040 · 19.8%Low 869 · 16.6%Moderate 554 · 10.6%High 139 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM

Death or neurodevelopmental impairment at age 2 to 3 years · babies born preterm, and their mothers

It is very uncertain whether DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping changes death or neurodevelopmental impairment at age 2 to 3 years compared with UCM (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC

Death or neurodevelopmental impairment at age 2 to 3 years · babies born preterm, and their mothers

DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact may leads to lower death or neurodevelopmental impairment at age 2 to 3 years compared with ECC (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Change in measures of growth and maturation: change in puberty proportion with Tanner stage ≧ 1 level ‐ at 2 years · children with familial hypercholesterolemia

The intervention showed no clear difference in change in measures of growth and maturation: change in puberty… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutrition systems strengthening interventions targeting children vs no intervention or standard care to reduce stunting (height‐for‐age, length at 18 months)

Mean height‐for‐age z‐score · children under 5 years old

Nutrition systems strengthening interventions targeting children may leads to higher height‐for‐age (z‐score) at 18 months compared with no intervention or standard care to reduce stunting (height‐for‐age,… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Micronutrient or macronutrient supplementation interventions in children vs no intervention, or placebo to reduce stunting (height‐for‐age, length velocity, and length at 12 months)

Stunting · children under 5 years old

Micronutrient or macronutrient supplementation interventions in… showed no clear difference in height‐for‐age (z‐score) compared with no intervention, or placebo to reduce stunting (height‐for‐age,… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Micronutrient or macronutrient supplementation interventions in children vs no intervention, or placebo to reduce stunting (height‐for‐age, length velocity, and length at 12 months)

Height‐for‐age (z‐score) Length gain (6 months) · children under 5 years old
1 finding from 1 review

Micronutrient or macronutrient supplementation interventions in children vs no intervention, or placebo to reduce stunting (height‐for‐age, length velocity, and length at 12 months)

Height‐for‐age (%) at 18 months, 21 months Length gain · children under 5 years old
1 finding from 1 review

Timer watch plus standard urotherapy vs urotherapy alone

Resource implications (e.g. cost of incontinence management methods) · children aged 5 to 14 years with overactive bladder and at least one episode of daytime urinary incontinence per week

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and standard urotherapy vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with electromyographic biofeedback and standard urotherapy

Resource implications (e.g. cost of incontinence management methods) · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with electromyography biofeedback and standard urotherapy vs pelvic floor muscle training without biofeedback but with standard urotherapy

Resource implications (e.g. cost of incontinence management methods) · children aged 5 to 15 years with dysfunctional elimination syndrome, 41/59 with daytime urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review