Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,554 questions in 140 reviews · Heart

current versions
No studies 272 · 17.5%Ungraded 44 · 2.8%Very low 329 · 21.2%Low 464 · 29.9%Moderate 319 · 20.5%High 126 · 8.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs another dietary intervention
HDL cholesterol (mmol/L), change from baseline (sensitivity analysis without Singh studies) · adults with established cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 71 participantsLow
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs another dietary intervention
Triglycerides (mmol/L), change from baseline (sensitivity analysis without Singh studies) · adults with established cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 71 participantsVery low
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs another dietary intervention
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), change from baseline (sensitivity analysis without Singh studies) · adults with established cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 150 participantsVery low
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs another dietary intervention
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), change from baseline (sensitivity analysis without Singh studies) · adults with established cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 150 participantsVery low
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs another dietary intervention
Adverse events · adults with established cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention
LDL cholesterol (mmol/L), change from baseline · adults without cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 389 participantsVery low
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention
HDL cholesterol (mmol/L), change from baseline · adults without cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 569 participantsLow
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention
Triglycerides (mmol/L), change from baseline · adults without cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 480 participantsLow
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), change from baseline · adults without cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 269 participantsModerate
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), change from baseline · adults without cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 269 participantsModerate
Mediterranean dietary intervention vs no intervention or minimal intervention
Adverse events · adults without cardiovascular disease
Mediterranean‐style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Exercise vs no exercise at the end of the intervention
All‐cause mortality ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.96 [0.18, 21.26]1 study · 196 participantsLow
Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up
Exercise‐capacity (VO2 peak) ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 136 participantsVery low
Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up
ICD, antitachycardia pacing ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 196 participantsVery low
Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up
ICD, appropriate shock ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.28 [0.05, 1.65]4 studies · 384 participantsVery low
Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up
ICD, all shocks ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.7, 1.12]1 study · 1053 participantsVery low
Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up
HRQoL ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 52 participantsVery low
Exercise vs no exercise at the end of the intervention
Serious adverse events ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.05 [0.77, 1.44]2 studies · 356 participantsLow
Exercise vs no exercise at the end of the intervention
Exercise‐capacity (VO2 peak) ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 1485 participantsVery low
Exercise vs no exercise at the end of the intervention
ICD, antitachycardia pacing ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.26 [0.84, 1.9]2 studies · 356 participantsModerate
Exercise vs no exercise at the end of the intervention
ICD, appropriate shock ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.56 [0.2, 1.58]3 studies · 428 participantsLow
Exercise vs no exercise at the end of the intervention
ICD, inappropriate shock ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.6 [0.1, 3.51]1 study · 160 participantsModerate
Exercise vs no exercise at the end of the intervention
Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 433 participantsVery low
Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up
All‐cause mortality ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.18 [0.65, 2.14]3 studies · 332 participantsVery low
Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up
Serious adverse events ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.61, 1.08]3 studies · 188 participantsVery low
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
All‐cause mortality at 'less than 3 months' · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.9, 1]46 studies · 80452 participantsHigh
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
MACE (major adverse cardiovascular event) at maximum · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.43, 1.52]4 studies · 475 participantsVery low
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Quality of life at maximum · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Angina at maximum · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.64844 participantsVery low
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Cardiovascular mortality at maximum · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.83, 0.98]14 studies · 22457 participantsModerate
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Myocardial infarction at maximum · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.75, 1.08]14 studies · 6825 participantsLow
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Serious adverse events at 'less than 3 months' · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
MACE (major adverse cardiovascular event) at 'less than 3 months' · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Quality of life at 'less than 3 months' · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Angina at 'less than 3 months' · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.25, 1.84]3 studies · 98 participantsVery low
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Cardiovascular mortality at 'less than 3 months' · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.91, 1.08]1 study · 45852 participantsModerate
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Myocardial infarction at 'less than 3 months' · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.74, 0.9]18 studies · 67562 participantsModerate
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
All‐cause mortality at maximum · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.86, 0.99]21 studies · 25210 participantsModerate
Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no intervention
Serious adverse events at maximum · patients with suspected or diagnosed myocardial infarction
Beta‐blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
PAP therapy vs usual care
All‐cause mortality · heart failure associated with central sleep apnoea
Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.54, 1.21]6 studies · 1804 participantsVery low
PAP therapy vs usual care
Cardiac‐related mortality · heart failure associated with central sleep apnoea
Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.77, 1.24]5 studies · 1775 participantsModerate
PAP therapy vs usual care
All‐cause rehospitalisation · heart failure associated with central sleep apnoea
Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.7, 1.3]5 studies · 1533 participantsLow
PAP therapy vs usual care
Cardiac‐related rehospitalisation · heart failure associated with central sleep apnoea
Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.7, 1.35]5 studies · 1533 participantsLow
PAP therapy vs usual care
QOL · heart failure associated with central sleep apnoea
Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1617 participantsLow
PAP therapy vs usual care
QOL: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) (points) scale from 0 to 105 · heart failure associated with central sleep apnoea
Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1458 participantsLow
PAP therapy vs usual care
Adverse events · heart failure associated with central sleep apnoea
Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1412 participantsLow
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
Cardiovascular mortality · patients without heart failure
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients without heart… (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.04, 3.17]1 study · 300 participantsLow
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
Cardiovascular hospitalisation (as defined by trialists) · patients without heart failure
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients without heart… (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.52 [0.4, 0.68]2 studies · 1674 participantsModerate
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
All‐cause mortality · patients without heart failure
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients without heart… (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.6, 1.35]2 studies · 1354 participantsLow
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
All‐cause hospitalisation (all occurrences) · patients without heart failure
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients without heart… (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.75, 0.92]2 studies · 1354 participantsModerate