Cochrane · systematic review · CD013015

Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients without heart failure

Sweeney, C, Ryan, F, Ledwidge, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

HeartAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 33.3%Moderate 3 · 50%High 1 · 16.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment compared to standard care for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients without heart failure

Population: patients without heart failure
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Cardiovascular mortality
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
RR 0.33 [0.04, 3.17]1 study · 300 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Cardiovascular hospitalisation (as defined by trialists)
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
RR 0.52 [0.4, 0.68]2 studies · 1674 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
All‐cause mortality
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
RR 0.9 [0.6, 1.35]2 studies · 1354 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
All‐cause hospitalisation (all occurrences)
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
RR 0.83 [0.75, 0.92]2 studies · 1354 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Ventricular dysfunction (as defined by trialists)
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
RR 0.61 [0.41, 0.91]1 study · 1374 participantsHigh
Change in NP level at the end of
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment vs standard care
no estimate extracted1 study · 1374 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision