Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Every word you type has to appear somewhere in the question, and the closest matches are ranked first.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

10,375 questions in 429 reviews · Oral Health

current versions
No studies 1,344 · 13%Ungraded 6,832 · 65.9%Very low 1,228 · 11.8%Low 613 · 5.9%Moderate 290 · 2.8%High 68 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment on permanent tooth surfaces (D(M)FS), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition) · Nearest to 3 years
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.28 [0.19, 0.36]25 studies · 8479 participantsModerate
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Oral mucositis (severe) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · Low-dose methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis after allogeneic HSCT
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.61, 1.25]1 study · 122 participantsVery low
Xylitol sucking tablets (1 g/day) vs No treatment
Caries increment (dmfs) · Infants/young children (primary teeth; baseline about 1 to 3 years) · 18 months (24-month follow-up)
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.53 [0.001, 1.04]1 study · 118 participantsVery low
Endodontic therapy (surgical or non-surgical) performed with the aid of one or more magnification devices (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs The same endodontic therapy performed without magnification devices (without visual enhancers)
Treatment success (resolution of clinical signs and symptoms with periapical radiographic healing) · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment · >=1 year after treatment
Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2015) · Cochrane
None of the studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria and therefore no data analysis was conducted (three potentially eligible trials were identified from 1234 records; all were excluded).NRNo studies
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Locoregional control · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
HR 0.68 [0.52, 0.89]1 study · 424 participantsModerate
Cessation of water fluoridation (fluoride removed from the water supply) vs Continued fluoridated water
Caries in permanent teeth (DMFS) · People of all ages in a previously fluoridated community (Maupome 2001: children with generally low caries experience) · Follow-up 3 years
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
Insufficient evidence to determine the effect of the cessation of water fluoridation on caries. One study (Maupome 2001), at high risk of bias, over 3 years found no increase in caries in the fluoride-ended group…1 study · 9249 participantsVery low
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months, Skin toxicity (gefitinib, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.82, 1.28]2 studies · 286 participantsUngraded
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device
Total time required to complete the clinical procedure · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment
Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2015) · Cochrane
No included study assessed procedure time. In the excluded trial Taschieri 2008, based on the operators' experience, completing the surgical procedure took on average four to five minutes longer for the endoscope than…NRNo studies
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device
Treatment success (resolution of clinical signs and symptoms with periapical radiographic healing) · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment · >=1 year after treatment
Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2015) · Cochrane
None of the studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria; the only trial comparing three magnification devices (Taschieri 2008) was excluded, so no data analysis was conducted.NRNo studies
Pilocarpine hydrochloride (parasympathomimetic) vs Placebo
Adverse effects (side effects; treatment withdrawals) · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Johnson 1993 (5 mg tds): sweating 37%, headache 15%, urinary frequency 14%, vasodilatation 12%, dizziness 10%, dyspepsia 10%, nausea 8%, asthenia 8%, diarrhoea 5%; 6% withdrew at 5 mg tds and 29% at 10 mg tds. LeVeque…2 studies · 278 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Normalcy of diet (days of total parenteral nutrition, TPN) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
MD -2.18 [-4.33, -0.03]1 study · 78 participantsVery low
Pilocarpine hydrochloride (parasympathomimetic) vs Artificial saliva (mucin-based)
Other oral symptoms (dysgeusia, dysphagia) · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Davies 1994 assessed dysgeusia and dysphagia; pilocarpine reported more effective than mucin-based artificial saliva for dysgeusia. No pooled data.1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Resin sealant (with or without flossing advice) vs Flossing advice (non-invasive control)
Caries (lesion) progression (radiographic) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up), Resin sealant
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.33 [0.18, 0.59]2 studiesUngraded
Non-specific immunotherapy (recombinant interleukin-2 or BCG cell wall preparation) plus standard therapy vs Standard therapy alone
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Leukopenia (rIL-2, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.57 [0.22, 1.50]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional treatment: fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment without surgical assistance
Patient-reported outcome: pain experience (discomfort) · Individuals of any age receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (braces) (people requiring orthodontic… · 24 hours to 28 days
Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment (2015) · Cochrane
Results: 'Pain experience was compared between surgical and non‐surgical cases in a single study (Alikhani 2013). Within 24 hours of appliance activation and canine retraction, both groups reported higher levels of…1 studyUngraded
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
Non-catastrophic failure of the restoration (requiring further treatment) · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment · 3 years
Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.04, 3.05]1 study · 117 participantsVery low
Barrier techniques (gloves/plasters) vs No treatment
Outcome NR · Children with a non-nutritive sucking habit (digit or pacifier)
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children (2015) · Cochrane
There were no studies that looked at barrier techniques or pacifier withdrawal.0 studiesNo studies
Sedation (sedative agents administered via any route) vs General anaesthesia
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents younger than 18 years having dental treatment (fillings, pulp treatment or tooth extraction);…
Sedation versus general anaesthesia for provision of dental treatment to patients younger than 18 years (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Number of days of treatment with opioid analgesics · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
MD -2.28 [-5.33, 0.77]1 study · 78 participantsVery low
Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional treatment: fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment without surgical assistance
Rate of tooth movement (orthodontic tooth movement in mm at 1 month) · Individuals of any age receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (braces) (people requiring orthodontic… · 1 month
Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment (2015) · Cochrane
MD 0.61 [0.49, 0.72]3 studies · 42 participantsLow
Down syndrome (trisomy 21) vs Individuals without Down syndrome (healthy controls: siblings, schoolchildren or others)
Dental caries (presence vs absence; all teeth, deciduous and permanent) · Individuals of any age (no age limit; ages 1 to 84 years across studies)
Association between Dental Caries and Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2015)
OR 0.36 [0.22, 0.57]2 studies · 314 participantsUngraded
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Satisfaction with treatment · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Satisfaction with treatment: No evidence available (Summary of findings 2).0 studiesNo studies
Xylitol lozenges (4.7 g/day) vs No treatment
Number of children with a caries increment · Children (permanent teeth; baseline 8 to 10 years) · 24 months (48-month follow-up)
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.83, 1.26]1 study · 200 participantsUngraded
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device
Quality of visualisation of root canal anatomy and morphology · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment
Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2015) · Cochrane
No included study assessed this outcome; the review notes that such secondary outcomes were only sporadically reported and were never statistically assessed.NRNo studies
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device
Removal of broken (fractured) instruments from the root canal · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment
Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2015) · Cochrane
No included study assessed this outcome; the review notes that such secondary outcomes were only sporadically reported and were never statistically assessed.NRNo studies
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months, Gastrointestinal complaints (grades >=3, pooled)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.83, 1.49]3 studies · 484 participantsUngraded
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration) vs Conventional invasive treatment (restoration / drill and fill)
Outcome NR · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in…
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
No studies compared micro-invasive treatments with invasive treatment (fillings)0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs No treatment
Presence of new caries in the primary teeth · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with… · 24 months, primary dentition
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.36, 2.77]2 studies · 487 participantsVery low
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Preformed metal crown (fitted using a conventional technique)
Outcome NR · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
None of the included studies compared the effectiveness or safety of the Hall Technique versus the conventional technique of fitting a crown. No RCT evidence found.0 studiesNo studies
Any intervention for KCOT (e.g. enucleation), alone or combined with an adjunctive therapy (ostectomy, cryotherapy, or Carnoy's solution) vs A different intervention (e.g. enucleation versus marsupialisation), or the same surgical intervention without the adjunctive therapy
Outcome NR · Adults over the age of 18 with a validated diagnosis of solitary keratocystic odontogenic tumours (KCOT) arising in…
Interventions for the treatment of keratocystic odontogenic tumours (2015) · Cochrane
No randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria were identified. In view of the fact that no studies were identified, no data were available for analysis.0 studiesNo studies
Non-specific immunotherapy (recombinant interleukin-2 or BCG cell wall preparation) plus standard therapy vs Standard therapy alone
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Increased temperature (BCG-CWP, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.13, 3.30]1 study · 24 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Oral mucositis (severe) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment for solid cancers
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.40 [0.27, 0.61]5 studies · 444 participantsModerate
Chlorhexidine varnish vs Placebo or no treatment
Pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or costs · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
No trials reported on pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or costs.0 studiesNo studies
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Normalcy of diet (days of total parenteral nutrition, TPN) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment for solid cancers
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Summary of findings for the main comparison (5FU solid cancers): Normalcy of diet (days of total parenteral nutrition) - 'No studies assessed this outcome'.0 studiesNo studies
Non-specific immunotherapy (recombinant interleukin-2 or BCG cell wall preparation) plus standard therapy vs Standard therapy alone
Locoregional control · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Recombinant interleukin-2 + neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Mantovani 1998), tumour response
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Response to treatment (Mantovani 1998; neoadjuvant chemotherapy + rIL-2 vs chemotherapy alone): complete response 4/13 vs 3/15; partial response 6/13 vs 9/15. Narrative only; no GRADE rating.1 study · 33 participantsUngraded
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months, Skin toxicity (grades >=3, pooled)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.25 [0.54, 2.88]4 studies · 544 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Number of days unable to take medicine orally · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment for solid cancers
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
No studies reported the number of days unable to take medicine orally (whole review).0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment on permanent whole teeth (D(M)FT), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition) · Nearest to 3 years, No-treatment-controlled trials
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.43 [0.29, 0.57]6 studiesUngraded
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment on primary (deciduous) whole teeth (d(m)ft), prevented fraction · Children with primary (deciduous) teeth (mostly preschool children aged under 6 years) · Nearest to 3 years
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
There were no data on d(m)ft available.0 studiesNo studies
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Number of days in hospital (duration of hospitalisation) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
MD -1.39 [-2.97, 0.19]2 studies · 123 participantsLow
Breastfeeding vs Bottle feeding
Presence of dental caries · Children with exclusively primary dentition (age ≤71 months)
Breast and Bottle Feeding as Risk Factors for Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2015)
Four studies showed that bottle fed children had more dental caries (p<0.05), while three studies found no such association (p>0.05); the review concluded that breastfeeding can protect against dental caries in early…7 studiesUngraded
Non-specific immunotherapy (recombinant interleukin-2 or BCG cell wall preparation) plus standard therapy vs Standard therapy alone
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Leukopenia (rIL-2, grades >=3)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.04, 3.26]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Pilocarpine hydrochloride (parasympathomimetic) vs Artificial saliva (mucin-based)
Xerostomia (subjective dry mouth; absolute change in VAS score) · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Davies 1994 (cross-over, 20 participants): mean improvement in VAS score 22.5 mm with pilocarpine vs 15.2 mm with artificial saliva (100 mm scale). The improvement was greater with pilocarpine but was not statistically…1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Resin infiltration vs Fluoride varnish, sham/placebo, or flossing advice (non-invasive control)
Caries (lesion) progression (radiographic) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up), Resin infiltration
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.19 [0.08, 0.46]2 studiesUngraded
Cessation of water fluoridation (fluoride removed from the water supply) vs Continued fluoridated water
Disparities in caries across socioeconomic status (SES) · People of all ages in a previously fluoridated community (Maupome 2001: children with generally low caries experience)
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No evidence to determine the effect of the cessation of water fluoridation on disparities in caries across SES.0 studiesNo studies
Fluoridated milk vs Non-fluoridated milk
Caries in primary teeth: dmft (3 years) · General population, irrespective of age or level of risk for dental caries · 3 years
Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
MD -1.14 [-1.86, -0.42]1 study · 166 participantsLow
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Adverse events: gingival bleeding · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Long term (12 months)
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.42, 2.86]1 study · 92 participantsVery low
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Pain · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Short term (less than 12 months)
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Short term (less than 12 months): effect not estimable (Analysis 1.2.1; 64 teeth, 32 participants; one study, Hutcheson 2012).1 study · 64 participantsUngraded
Psychological interventions (positive and negative reinforcement) vs No treatment
Sucking cessation (long term) · Children with a non-nutritive sucking habit (digit or pacifier) · Long term (12 months or more)
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children (2015) · Cochrane
RR 6.25 [1.65, 23.65]1 study · 57 participantsUngraded
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Skin toxicity/acneiform rash (cetuximab, grades >=3)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 17.72 [8.33, 37.73]3 studies · 1403 participantsUngraded