Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,536 questions · 2,637 findings · 315 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 608 · 23.1%GRADE not reported 488 · 18.5%Very low 688 · 26.1%Low 540 · 20.5%Moderate 249 · 9.4%High 64 · 2.4%

Single‐component hydration intervention vs control

All‐cause mortality · people at risk of delirium in institutional long‐term care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Single‐component hydration intervention vs control

Cognitive function · people at risk of delirium in institutional long‐term care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Single‐component hydration intervention vs control

Falls · people at risk of delirium in institutional long‐term care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Single‐component hydration intervention vs control

Hospital admissions · people at risk of delirium in institutional long‐term care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Multicomponent educational intervention vs control

Prevalence of delirium · preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care

It is very uncertain whether multicomponent educational intervention changes prevalence of delirium compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.57 [0.15, 2.19]
1 study · 160 participants
Very low

Multicomponent educational intervention vs control

Incidence of delirium · preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care

It is very uncertain whether multicomponent educational intervention changes incidence of delirium compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.62 [0.16, 2.39]
1 study · 137 participants
Very low

Any intervention vs steroid alone or plus levofloxacin

Resolution of symptoms · epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

1 finding from 1 review

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Any intervention vs steroid alone or plus levofloxacin

Proportion of participants with resolution of signs within 7 days of treatment (higher is favored) · epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

1 finding from 1 review

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Any intervention vs steroid alone or plus levofloxacin

Proportion of eyes in which SEI had developed within 21 days of treatment (lower is favored) · epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

It is very uncertain whether any intervention changes proportion of eyes in which SEI had developed within 21 days of… compared with steroid alone or plus levofloxacin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.08 [0.01, 0.55]
2 studies · 69 participants
Very low

Any intervention vs steroid alone or plus levofloxacin

Proportion of participants in whose eyes SEI had disappeared within 21 days of treatment (higher is favored) · epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

1 finding from 1 review

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Any intervention vs steroid alone or plus levofloxacin

Proportion of participants who discontinued medication and did not develop rebound SEI within 21 days (higher is favored) · epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

It is very uncertain whether any intervention changes proportion of participants who discontinued medication and did not… compared with steroid alone or plus levofloxacin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.04 [0.94, 1.14]
3 studies · 231 participants
Very low

Any intervention vs steroid alone or plus levofloxacin

Proportion of participants who had evidence of adenoviral eradication within 14 days of treatment (higher is favored) · epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

1 finding from 1 review

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Any intervention vs steroid alone or plus levofloxacin

Proportion of initially unaffected fellow eyes that had signs/symptoms of infection within 7 days of onset of signs/symptoms in the first eye (lower is favored) · epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Any intervention vs steroid alone or plus levofloxacin

Mean number of days from treatment initiation to resolution of symptoms or signs (shorter is favored) · epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

1 finding from 1 review

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Vitamin D given to infants vs placebo or no treatment

Bone mineral content at the end of intervention mg/cmPhoton absorptiometry · term breastfed infants to prevent vitamin D deficiency and improve bone health

1 finding from 1 review

Vitamin D supplementation for term breastfed infants to prevent vitamin D deficiency and improve bone health 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 56 participants
Very low

Increasing community demand vs no intervention or another intervention

Client reminder and recall (tailored letter or postcard or phone call) compared to no intervention · people aged 60 years and older living in the community

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
16 studies · 195964 participants
High

Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone

Proportion who received intervention for surgical complications within one year Number of participants · patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma

Combined surgery showed no clear difference in proportion who received intervention for surgical complications… compared with phacoemulsification alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [0.34, 3.35]
4 studies · 382 participants
Low

LC + LCBDE vs LC + post‐operative ERCP

Retained stones after primary intervention · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE probably leads to lower retained stones after primary intervention compared with LC + post‐operative ERCP (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.28 [0.11, 0.72]
2 studies · 166 participants
Moderate

Open surgery vs ERCP

Retained stones after primary intervention · with common bile duct stones

Open surgery probably leads to lower retained stones after primary intervention compared with ERCP (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.36 [0.23, 0.57]
7 studies · 943 participants
Moderate

LC + LCBDE vs pre‐operative ERCP + LC

Retained stones after primary intervention · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE showed no clear difference in retained stones after primary intervention compared with pre‐operative ERCP + LC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.79 [0.45, 1.39]
5 studies · 580 participants
Moderate