evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,749 questions · 14,261 findings · 832 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 3,655 · 25.6%GRADE not reported 2,111 · 14.8%Very low 3,646 · 25.6%Low 3,028 · 21.2%Moderate 1,501 · 10.5%High 320 · 2.2%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Elective radical (comprehensive) neck dissection vs Elective selective neck dissection

Disease-free survival · Adults with oral cavity cancer

It is very uncertain whether elective radical (comprehensive) neck dissection changes disease-free survival (new disease, progression, and mortality) compared with elective selective neck dissection (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs placebo or no treatment

Adverse events · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars)
1 finding from 1 review
  • Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) 2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
    Follow-up: median 7 days
    No adverse events were reported. Six trials (673 participants) reported no adverse events from the use of chlorhexidine gel; one study (Rubio-Palau 2015) reported gastrointestinal discomfort (30, 18%), dizziness (10,…
    7 studies
    GRADE not reported

Neocone vs Alvogyl

Time to initial pain relief (minutes) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction

Neocone led to higher time to initial pain relief (minutes) compared with alvogyl; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Tranexamic acid (AMCA cones) vs Placebo (lactose cones)

Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars)

Tranexamic acid (AMCA cones) showed no clear difference in presence of dry socket compared with placebo (lactose cones); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Primary closure of the extraction socket with a mucoperiosteal flap vs Application of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) without primary closure

MRONJ (incidence proportion) · People on antiresorptive treatment undergoing tooth extraction (at risk of MRONJ)
1 finding from 1 review
  • Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw 2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
    90 days
    All participants had complete mucosal coverage without any signs of MRONJ at the final control examination 90 days postoperatively (77 randomised; 1 RCT); no case of postoperative MRONJ in either group; effect not…
    1 study · 77 participants
    GRADE not reported

Apernyl (acetylsalicylic acid pellet) vs placebo

Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars)

Apernyl (acetylsalicylic acid pellet) showed no clear difference in presence of dry socket compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Advanced platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) vs No active treatment (control)

Pain (VAS cm) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction

Advanced platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) led to lower pain (VAS cm) compared with control (no treatment); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

SaliCept (acemannan hydrogel) vs no treatment

Pain (VAS) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
1 finding from 1 review

Dental extraction protocol with plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) inserted into the postextraction alveolus vs Standard dental extraction protocol without PRGF

Complications and side effects · People with cancer treated with intravenous bisphosphonates undergoing dental extractions (at risk of MRONJ)
1 finding from 1 review

Neocone vs Alvogyl

Mean time to resolution of pain · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction

Neocone led to lower time to complete resolution of pain (days) compared with alvogyl; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Teriparatide 20 microg daily in addition to standard care vs placebo + standard care

Healing of MRONJ · People with established (manifest) MRONJ

Teriparatide 20 microg daily in addition to standard care showed no clear difference in healing of MRONJ (resolution of lesions) compared with placebo in addition to standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Concentrated growth factor (CGF) and primary wound closure vs primary closure

Healing of MRONJ (soft tissue healing) · Women with osteoporosis and established MRONJ

It is very uncertain whether concentrated growth factor (CGF) and primary wound closure changes healing of MRONJ (soft tissue healing) compared with primary wound closure only (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review