Question · asked by 1 review
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs Chlorhexidine mouthrinse: Adverse events
- Population
- Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars)
- Intervention
- Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket)
- Comparison
- Chlorhexidine mouthrinse
- Outcome
- Adverse events
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs Chlorhexidine rinse (0.12%) Adverse events · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes | No adverse events were reported in these two trials (Abu-Mostafa 2015; Hita-Iglesias 2008). | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) 2022 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-09 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs placebo or no treatment · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.