Question · asked by 1 review

Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs placebo or no treatment: Adverse events

Population
Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars)
Intervention
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket)
Comparison
placebo or no treatment
Outcome
Adverse events

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs Placebo or no treatment
Adverse events · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
No adverse events were reported. Six trials (673 participants) reported no adverse events from the use of chlorhexidine gel; one study (Rubio-Palau 2015) reported gastrointestinal discomfort (30, 18%), dizziness (10,…7 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket)
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-09Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.