Question · asked by 1 review

Dental extraction protocol with plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) inserted into the postextraction alveolus vs Standard dental extraction protocol without PRGF: Complications and side effects

Population
People with cancer treated with intravenous bisphosphonates undergoing dental extractions (at risk of MRONJ)
Intervention
Dental extraction protocol with plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) inserted into the postextraction alveolus
Comparison
Standard dental extraction protocol without PRGF
Outcome
Complications and side effects

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Dental extraction protocol with plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) inserted into the postextraction alveolus vs Standard dental extraction protocol without PRGF
Rate of complications and side effects of the intervention · People with cancer treated with intravenous bisphosphonates undergoing dental extractions (at risk of MRONJ) · 24 to 60 months
Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
No intraoperative complications were observed in either of the groups.1 study · 176 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-06Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.