Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

778 questions · 809 findings · 116 reviews

No studies found 205 · 25.3%GRADE not reported 111 · 13.7%Very low 225 · 27.8%Low 155 · 19.2%Moderate 85 · 10.5%High 28 · 3.5%

Summary of findings table ‐ Repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids vs single course

D1: Total deaths (after randomisation) up to mid‐ to later childhood · the child

Summary of findings table ‐ Repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids showed no clear difference in D1: Total deaths (after randomisation) up to mid‐ to later childhood compared with single course (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids vs single course

D2: Neurocognitive impairment atmid‐ to later childhood · the child

Summary of findings table ‐ Repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids showed no clear difference in D2: Neurocognitive impairment atmid‐ to later childhood compared with single course (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids vs single course

D3: Survival free of neurocognitive impairment atmid‐ to later childhood · the child

Summary of findings table ‐ Repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids showed no clear difference in D3: Survival free of neurocognitive impairment atmid‐ to later… compared with single course (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids vs single course

D4: Survival free of major neurocognitive impairment atmid‐ to later childhood · the child

Summary of findings table ‐ Repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids showed no clear difference in D4: Survival free of major neurocognitive impairment atmid‐ to later… compared with single course (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

IVIg vs placebo

Proportion of participants with an improvement in disability at 12 months or later · people with multifocal motor neuropathy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Responsive complementary feeding (RCF) / other caregivers' feeding practices vs Other models of complementary feeding (traditional/non-responsive CF)

Dental caries · Healthy, term-born, normal-birth-weight infants aged 4-24 months (breastfed and/or formula-fed) in Western industrialized countries

No eligible studies examined the influence of complementary feeding practices on later dental caries; this is an evidence gap.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Incidence of a secondary primary breast cancer (e.g. in the contralateral breast) ‐ endocrine therapies not separated (exemestane (AI)/tamoxifen (SERM)/unknown) · women receiving endocrine therapy (selective oestrogen receptor modulator or aromatase inhibitor)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Severe hearing loss defined as a threshold of 60 dB or more in the better ear or requiring bilateral hearing aid during the · children with acute bacterial meningitis

The intervention showed no clear difference in severe hearing loss defined as a threshold of 60 dB or more in the… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carotid artery stenting vs endarterectomy

Death or any stroke between randomisation and 30 days after treatment or ipsilateral stroke until end of · people with symptomatic carotid stenosis

Carotid artery stenting leads to higher death or any stroke between randomisation and 30 days after… compared with endarterectomy (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carotid artery stenting vs endarterectomy

Death or any stroke between randomisation and 30 days after treatment or ipsilateral stroke until end of · asymptomatic carotid stenosis

Carotid artery stenting showed no clear difference in death or any stroke between randomisation and 30 days after… compared with endarterectomy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review