Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

5,762 questions in 263 reviews · Dental caries

current versions
No studies 321 · 5.6%Ungraded 4,450 · 77.2%Very low 455 · 7.9%Low 297 · 5.2%Moderate 200 · 3.5%High 39 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Fluoride varnish vs Placebo or no treatment
Adverse effects / specific side effects (oral allergic reactions, mucosal irritation, adverse symptoms such as nausea, gagging, vomiting) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less · At least 1 year
Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane
Three trials (Salazar 2008; Skold 2005; Weintraub 2006) provided data reporting no adverse effects. There was little information concerning possible adverse effects; no pooled estimate was possible.3 studiesUngraded
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing
Plaque (plaque indices; standardised across indices) · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older · 1 month (4 to 6 weeks)
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
SMD 0.10 [-0.13, 0.33]7 studies · 326 participantsLow
Laser fluorescence (LF; DIAGNOdent) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by reference standard (LF, initial, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · Initial caries lesions threshold, Other reference standard vs histological (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 4.13 [1.24, 13.76]NRUngraded
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing
Gingivitis (bleeding and gingival indices; standardised across indices) · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older · 3 months (12 weeks)
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
SMD -1.98 [-5.42, 1.47]2 studies · 107 participantsVery low
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing
Bad breath (halitosis) · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
Not estimable. No included study assessed bad breath as an outcome. (See comment)0 studiesNo studies
Resin composite restorations (filling and bonding systems) containing antibacterial agents vs Composite restorations not containing antibacterial agents
Patient's view and satisfaction with the treatment · Adults and adolescents in any age group with restorations in the permanent dentition and children with restorations in…
Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries (2013) · Cochrane
No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls.0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride varnish vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment in primary/deciduous teeth: decayed, (extraction indicated/missing) and filled teeth d(e/m)ft (prevented fraction) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less · At least 1 year, Primary/deciduous dentition
Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane
PF 0.65 [0.48, 0.82]2 studies · 322 participantsUngraded
A permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of posterior teeth,…
Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane
Main results: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Effects of interventions: No studies met the inclusion criteria.0 studiesNo studies
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone
Quality of life · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
Not estimable. No included study assessed quality of life as an outcome. (See comment)0 studiesNo studies
Resin-based fissure sealants vs Glass-ionomer cement-based fissure sealants
Retention-to-caries risk ratio (RCR) · Patients with fissure-sealed permanent molar teeth · Longest follow-up per trial, Sensitivity analysis
Validity of sealant retention as surrogate for caries prevention--a systematic review. (2013)
Mean RCR (retention-to-caries risk ratio); t-test of difference Resin vs GIC difference not statistically significant (p=0.069); sensitivity-analysis mean RCRs not reported14 studiesUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
Initial caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with approximal surfaces · Initial caries lesion threshold, LFpen, approximal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.777 [0.706, 0.838]2 studiesUngraded
DHAT-delivered dental care vs Dentist-delivered dental care
Composite restoration deficiency · Alaska dental health aide therapists
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Proportion of deficient composite restorations 15% vs 12%2 studiesUngraded
Resin composite restorations (filling and bonding systems) containing antibacterial agents vs Composite restorations not containing antibacterial agents
Adverse effects · Adults and adolescents in any age group with restorations in the permanent dentition and children with restorations in…
Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries (2013) · Cochrane
No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls.0 studiesNo studies
Fluorescence camera (FC) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Primary teeth with occlusal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, FC, occlusal, primary teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Specificity 0.898 [0.867, 0.924]2 studiesUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
Initial caries lesion detection · Primary teeth with occlusal surfaces · Initial caries lesion threshold, LFpen, occlusal, primary teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.719 [0.677, 0.757]5 studiesUngraded
Primary school-based behavioural intervention (both oral hygiene and dietary components) vs No intervention or delayed intervention (non-intervention control; one trial's control received dental treatment plus an annual supervised toothbrushing session)
Changes in dental attendance · Children aged 4 to 12 years attending primary school
Primary school‐based behavioural interventions for preventing caries (2013) · Cochrane
Worthington 2001 found no change in reported dental visits over the course of the programmes, with 97% of children at baseline reporting visiting the dentist every 2 years.1 studyUngraded
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone
Gingivitis (Loe-Silness gingival index, interproximal; scale 0 to 4) · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older · 4 weeks (1 month)
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
MD -0.53 [-0.83, -0.23]1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen; DIAGNOdent pen) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by setting (LFpen, advanced, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold, Laboratory vs clinical (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 0.35 [0.04, 2.99]NRUngraded
Glass-ionomer cement-based fissure sealants vs No comparator (within-material surrogate-validity regression)
Association between loss of complete retention risk and caries occurrence risk · Patients with fissure-sealed permanent molar teeth · At least 24 months, Main analysis
Validity of sealant retention as surrogate for caries prevention--a systematic review. (2013)
Regression slope (ln caries risk on ln retention-loss risk) 0.81 [-0.07, 1.68]22 studies · 3768 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Risk of loss of complete retention · Main analysis; resin-based (Mat 1)
Validity of sealant retention as surrogate for caries prevention--a systematic review. (2013)
Mean risk (proportion of sealed teeth) 0.36 (SD 0.23)54 studiesUngraded
Fluorescence camera (FC) vs Reference standard
Initial caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with occlusal surfaces · Initial caries lesion threshold, FC, occlusal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.708 [0.669, 0.745]8 studiesUngraded
Laser fluorescence (LF) vs Reference standard
Initial caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with occlusal surfaces · Initial caries lesion threshold, LF, occlusal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Specificity 0.712 [0.690, 0.734]27 studiesUngraded
Laser fluorescence (LF; DIAGNOdent) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by reference standard (LF, advanced, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold, Operative intervention vs histological (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 3.01 [1.26, 7.20]NRUngraded
Laser fluorescence (LF; DIAGNOdent) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by reference standard (LF, initial, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · Initial caries lesions threshold, Operative intervention vs histological (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 0.91 [0.37, 2.22]NRUngraded
Primary school-based behavioural intervention (both oral hygiene and dietary components) vs No intervention or delayed intervention (non-intervention control; one trial's control received dental treatment plus an annual supervised toothbrushing session)
Behavioural outcomes (reported and/or other measures, e.g. data tracking toothbrushes and collecting food wrappers) · Children aged 4 to 12 years attending primary school
Primary school‐based behavioural interventions for preventing caries (2013) · Cochrane
No other behavioural outcomes (e.g. objective toothbrush tracking or food-wrapper collection) were measured by the four included studies.0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride varnish vs Placebo or no treatment
Proportion of children developing one or more new caries (permanent dentition, D(M)FT) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less · At least 1 year
Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.53, 1.05]5 studies · 3253 participantsUngraded
Laser fluorescence (LF) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with occlusal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, LF, occlusal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Specificity 0.779 [0.765, 0.794]37 studiesUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen; DIAGNOdent pen) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, summary-ROC AUC) · Permanent teeth, approximal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · Initial caries lesions threshold
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR and summary-ROC AUC reported qualitatively (Figure 8); only LFpen had sufficient studies to pool; similar values at both thresholds. Heterogeneity I2=93%. Numeric pooled…NRUngraded
Resin-based fissure sealants vs No comparator (within-material surrogate-validity regression)
Association between loss of complete retention risk and caries occurrence risk · Patients with fissure-sealed permanent molar teeth · At least 24 months, Main analysis
Validity of sealant retention as surrogate for caries prevention--a systematic review. (2013)
Regression slope (ln caries risk on ln retention-loss risk) 0.89 [0.56, 1.23]54 studies · 17377 participantsUngraded
Community and caregiver oral health education plus media campaign vs Pre-intervention BBTD rate
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence · Alaska Native and American Indian Head Start children · 3 years, Medium-intensity training
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percent reduction in BBTD prevalence 181 studyUngraded
Laser fluorescence (LF; DIAGNOdent) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by setting (LF, advanced, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold, Laboratory vs clinical (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 0.28 [0.12, 0.66]NRUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Primary teeth with occlusal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, LFpen, occlusal, primary teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.831 [0.723, 0.909]5 studiesUngraded
DHAT-delivered dental care vs Dentist-delivered dental care
Consistency of diagnosis and postoperative complications · Alaska dental health aide therapists
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
There was no significant difference between DHATs and dentists in consistency of diagnosis or postoperative complications.1 studyUngraded
Community and caregiver oral health education (training community volunteers, health workers and site coordinators; caregiver counselling; oral health media campaign) vs Pre-intervention baseline (and sites that discontinued the prevention program)
Reduction in prevalence of baby bottle tooth decay (BBTD) · Alaska Native and American Indian Head Start (preschool) children · 3 to 8 years
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percent reduction in BBTD prevalence 251 studyUngraded
Ongoing BBTD Prevention Program vs BBTD Prevention Program discontinued in 1989
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence · Alaska Native and American Indian Head Start children · 1986 to 1994, Program discontinued
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percent reduction in tooth decay rate 151 studyUngraded
Fluorescence camera (FC; VistaProof) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, summary-ROC AUC) · Primary teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR and summary-ROC AUC reported qualitatively (Figure 7); pooled DOR highest for FC among the three methods. Heterogeneity I2=80%. Numeric pooled values not available in the…NRUngraded
PDHA program vs Baseline pre-intervention scenario
Mean decayed missing and filled teeth · Alaska children below age 5 years · 20 years
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Mean DMFT 7.4 to 4.91 studyUngraded
Ongoing BBTD Prevention Program vs BBTD Prevention Program discontinued in 1989
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence · Alaska Native and American Indian Head Start children · 1986 to 1994, Program maintained
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percent reduction in tooth decay rate 281 studyUngraded
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing
Quality of life · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
Not estimable. No included study assessed quality of life as an outcome. (See comment)0 studiesNo studies
Intervention NR
Caries occurrence on sealed teeth · 24 months, original datasets only (permanent teeth)
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin… (2013)
RR 2.10 [1.23, 3.58]4 studiesUngraded
Laser fluorescence (LF) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with occlusal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, LF, occlusal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.809 [0.791, 0.827]37 studiesUngraded
Glass-ionomer cement-based fissure sealants vs No comparator (within-material surrogate-validity regression)
Association between loss of complete retention risk and caries occurrence risk · Patients with fissure-sealed permanent molar teeth · Longest follow-up per trial, Sensitivity analysis
Validity of sealant retention as surrogate for caries prevention--a systematic review. (2013)
Regression slope (ln caries risk on ln retention-loss risk) 1.44 [0.71, 2.18]14 studies · 2307 participantsUngraded
Primary school-based behavioural intervention (both oral hygiene and dietary components) vs No intervention or delayed intervention (non-intervention control; one trial's control received dental treatment plus an annual supervised toothbrushing session)
Adverse events · Children aged 4 to 12 years attending primary school
Primary school‐based behavioural interventions for preventing caries (2013) · Cochrane
No study reported any adverse events.0 studiesNo studies
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen; DIAGNOdent pen) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, summary-ROC AUC) · Primary teeth, approximal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · Initial caries lesions threshold
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR and summary-ROC AUC reported qualitatively (Figure 8); only LFpen had sufficient studies to pool. Heterogeneity I2=84%. Numeric pooled values not available in the provided…NRUngraded
Laser fluorescence (LF; DIAGNOdent) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by setting (LF, advanced, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold, Laboratory using frozen teeth vs clinical (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 0.45 [0.12, 1.67]NRUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen; DIAGNOdent pen) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by setting (LFpen, advanced, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold, Laboratory using frozen teeth vs clinical (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 1.27 [0.18, 8.79]NRUngraded
Partial caries removal (single stage; residual dentinal caries sealed into the tooth definitively) vs Complete caries removal
Signs or symptoms of pulpal disease · Patients with carious teeth, affecting any tooth surface(s), in unrestored primary and permanent teeth · 1 year
Operative caries management in adults and children (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.27 [0.05, 1.60]3 studies · 172 participantsLow
Laser fluorescence (LF) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Primary teeth with occlusal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, LF, occlusal, primary teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.672 [0.616, 0.725]13 studiesUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen; DIAGNOdent pen) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, summary-ROC AUC) · Primary teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · Initial caries lesions threshold
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR and summary-ROC AUC reported qualitatively (Figure 7); accuracy similar among the three methods. Heterogeneity I2=0%. Numeric pooled values not available in the provided…NRUngraded
DHAT-delivered dental care vs Dentist-delivered dental care
Stainless steel crown preparation and placement deficiency · Alaska dental health aide therapists
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Proportion deficient 0% for preparations; 3% vs 9% for placements2 studiesUngraded