Cochrane · intervention · CD007819
Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries
Pereira‐Cenci, T, Cenci, MS, Fedorowicz, Z, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
6
Included studies
0
as reported
No studies 6 · 100%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Review question
| Element | Planned (methods) | Found (results) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | Adults and adolescents in any age group with restorations in the permanent dentition and children with restorations in the primary dentition | Insufficient data |
| Intervention | Resin composite restorations (filling and bonding systems) containing antibacterial agents | Insufficient data |
| Comparison | Composite restorations not containing antibacterial agents | Insufficient data |
| Outcomes | Secondary caries; Longevity of restorations (time to failure in months); Postoperative sensitivity, marginal adaptation, anatomic form and other clinical outcomes (USPHS restoration quality); Patient's view and satisfaction with the treatment; Costs (direct costs of interventions); Adverse effects | Insufficient data |
| Study designs | Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) | Insufficient data |
| Timing | Not specified | Insufficient data |
Search date: 2013-07. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 23 July 2013); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 6); MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 23 July 2013); EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 23 July 2013); meta Register of Controlled Trials…
Questions and results
Show all 3 versionsResin composite restorations (filling and bonding systems) containing antibacterial agents vs Composite restorations not containing antibacterial agents
Population: Adults and adolescents in any age group with restorations in the permanent dentition and children with restorations in the primary dentition
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Costs (direct costs of interventions) | No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls. | 0 studies | No studies |
Patient's view and satisfaction with the treatment | No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls. | 0 studies | No studies |
Secondary caries | No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls. | 0 studies | No studies |
Adverse effects | No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls. | 0 studies | No studies |
Postoperative sensitivity, marginal adaptation, anatomic form and other clinical outcomes (USPHS restoration quality; includes tooth vitality and pulpitis) | No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls. | 0 studies | No studies |
Longevity of restorations (time to failure in months) | No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls. | 0 studies | No studies |