Cochrane · intervention · CD007157
Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents
Dashash, M, Yeung, CA, Jamous, I, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
2
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
2
Included studies
0
as reported
No studies 2 · 100%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Review question
| Element | Planned (methods) | Found (results) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | All children and adolescents under 18, who had AI and required restorative care, eligible for inclusion irrespective of nationality | Not reported |
| Intervention | Permanent restorative materials and techniques for teeth affected by AI: metal restorations (amalgam); glass ionomers (type I, II, III, IV); composite resins (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomers (compomers, giomers); cement; stainless steel/nickel-chrome crowns; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facings; microabrasion | Not reported |
| Comparison | A different restorative material or technique (head-to-head comparison); studies comparing microabrasion with dental restorations would have been included; dental restorations versus overdenture or extraction excluded | Not reported |
| Outcomes | Primary: patient satisfaction due to reduced dental sensitivity and improved aesthetics. Secondary: improved aesthetics (self esteem, comfort, positive psychological impact); improved masticatory function; longevity of restoration. Adverse events would also have been documented | Not reported |
| Study designs | Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) | Not reported |
| Timing | Not specified | Not reported |
Search date: 2013-04. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 18 April 2013); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 3); MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 18 April 2013); EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 18 April 2013); CINAHL via EBSCO (1980 to 18 April 2013); Abstracts of…
Questions and results
Show all 2 versionsA permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique
Population: Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of anterior teeth, irrespective of nationality
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Main results: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Effects of interventions: No studies met the inclusion criteria. | 0 studies | No studies |
A permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique
Population: Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of posterior teeth, irrespective of nationality
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | Main results: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Effects of interventions: No studies met the inclusion criteria. | 0 studies | No studies |