Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

5,762 questions in 263 reviews · Dental caries

current versions
No studies 321 · 5.6%Ungraded 4,450 · 77.2%Very low 455 · 7.9%Low 297 · 5.2%Moderate 200 · 3.5%High 39 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Primary school-based behavioural intervention (both oral hygiene and dietary components) vs No intervention or delayed intervention (non-intervention control; one trial's control received dental treatment plus an annual supervised toothbrushing session)
Plaque indices (permanent and deciduous teeth) · Children aged 4 to 12 years attending primary school · 3 to 15 months
Primary school‐based behavioural interventions for preventing caries (2013) · Cochrane
SoF (Plaque indices, follow-up 3 to 15 months): 'All 3 RCTs showed a reduction in plaque in the intervention group compared to control group'; 827 participants (3 RCTs); GRADE low; comment 'Data not suitable for…3 studies · 827 participantsLow
Fluorescence camera (FC; VistaProof) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by setting (FC, advanced, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold, Laboratory using frozen teeth vs clinical (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 2.96 [0.36, 24.45]NRUngraded
Partial caries removal (single stage; residual dentinal caries sealed into the tooth definitively) vs Complete caries removal
Pulp exposure during caries removal · Patients with carious teeth, affecting any tooth surface(s), in unrestored primary and permanent teeth · During caries removal
Operative caries management in adults and children (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.23 [0.08, 0.69]2 studies · 141 participantsModerate
PDHA program with robust prevention vs PDHA program or PDHA program with intensive staffing
Tooth decay-free children · Alaska children aged 5 to 18 years · 20 years
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percentage tooth decay-free >50% vs 8%1 studyUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Primary teeth with approximal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, LFpen, approximal, primary teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Specificity 0.958 [0.947, 0.968]5 studiesUngraded
Partial caries removal (single stage; residual dentinal caries sealed into the tooth definitively) vs Complete caries removal
Failure of restorations · Patients with carious teeth, affecting any tooth surface(s), in unrestored primary and permanent teeth · 1 year
Operative caries management in adults and children (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.62]1 study · 32 participantsVery low
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone
Harms and adverse effects · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
Not estimable. Only 1 study reported adverse outcomes in terms of problems with the use of the assigned interdental cleaning aids. (See comment) In this comparison the single study (Jared 2005) asked participants to…1 studyUngraded
Stepwise excavation (two-stage caries removal, re-entry after an interval) vs One stage complete caries removal
Progression of caries · Patients with carious teeth, affecting any tooth surface(s), in unrestored primary and permanent teeth
Operative caries management in adults and children (2013) · Cochrane
None of the eight included studies reported on the primary outcome of progression of caries.0 studiesNo studies
Fluorescence camera (FC) vs Reference standard
Initial caries lesion detection · Primary teeth with occlusal surfaces · Initial caries lesion threshold, FC, occlusal, primary teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.482 [0.433, 0.531]2 studiesUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen; DIAGNOdent pen) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, summary-ROC AUC) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR and summary-ROC AUC reported qualitatively (Figure 6); pooled DOR for LFpen lower than for LF and FC. Heterogeneity I2=73%. Numeric pooled values not available in the…NRUngraded
No dentinal caries removal (caries sealed under a preformed metal crown or restoration without removing dentinal caries) vs Complete caries removal
Failure of restorations · Patients with carious teeth, affecting any tooth surface(s), in unrestored primary and permanent teeth · 1 year (2-year and 5-year data also available for Innes 2007)
Operative caries management in adults and children (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.08 [0.02, 0.26]1 study · 132 participantsModerate
Fluoride varnish vs Placebo or no treatment
Proportion of children developing one or more new caries (primary/deciduous dentition, d(e/m)ft) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less · At least 1 year, Primary/deciduous dentition
Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.62, 1.06]5 studies · 1228 participantsUngraded
Community and caregiver oral health education plus media campaign vs Pre-intervention BBTD rate
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence · Alaska Native and American Indian Head Start children · 3 years, High-intensity training
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percent reduction in BBTD prevalence 331 studyUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with occlusal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, LFpen, occlusal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.724 [0.672, 0.772]10 studiesUngraded
Primary school-based behavioural intervention (both oral hygiene and dietary components) vs No intervention or delayed intervention (non-intervention control; one trial's control received dental treatment plus an annual supervised toothbrushing session)
Caries increment on tooth surfaces (dmfs/DMFS) (prevented fraction) · Children aged 4 to 12 years attending primary school · 15 months
Primary school‐based behavioural interventions for preventing caries (2013) · Cochrane
PF 0.65 [0.12, 1.18]1 study · 60 participantsLow
Laser fluorescence (LF; DIAGNOdent) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by reference standard (LF, advanced, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold, Other reference standard vs histological (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 0.62 [0.15, 2.46]NRUngraded
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone
Bad breath (halitosis) · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
Not estimable. No included study assessed bad breath as an outcome. (See comment)0 studiesNo studies
Primary dental health aide (PDHA) service-delivery models (PDHA program; PDHA + intensive staffing; PDHA + robust prevention) vs Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario
Projected Significant Caries (SiC) index · Alaska Native children (below age 18) · 20-year projection, Children overall
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Significant Caries (SiC) index, children 6.11 studyUngraded
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing
Gingivitis (bleeding and gingival indices; standardised across indices) · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older · 1 month (4 to 6 weeks)
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
SMD -0.53 [-0.81, -0.24]7 studies · 326 participantsLow
Primary dental health aide (PDHA) service-delivery models (PDHA program; PDHA + intensive staffing; PDHA + robust prevention) vs Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario
Projected proportion of caries-free children (5-18 years) · Alaska Native children (below age 18) · 20-year projection, Baseline (pre-intervention) model
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Caries-free children 5-18 y (%) 01 studyUngraded
Intervention NR
Caries occurrence on sealed teeth · 12 months, original datasets only (permanent teeth)
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin… (2013)
RR 2.61 [0.61, 11.14]2 studiesUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
Initial caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with occlusal surfaces · Initial caries lesion threshold, LFpen, occlusal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Specificity 0.818 [0.751, 0.873]9 studiesUngraded
Conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) fissure sealants vs Resin-based fissure sealants
Caries occurrence on sealed teeth · Sealed permanent teeth · 12 months, 12 months (permanent teeth)
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin… (2013)
RR 1.66 [0.75, 3.68]5 studies · 1952 participantsUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with approximal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, LFpen, approximal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Specificity 0.824 [0.761, 0.875]2 studiesUngraded
Laser fluorescence (LF; DIAGNOdent) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, summary-ROC AUC) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · Initial caries lesions threshold
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR and summary-ROC AUC reported qualitatively (Figure 6); accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR, sROC AUC) similar among LF, LFpen and FC. Heterogeneity I2=65%.…NRUngraded
Resin composite restorations (filling and bonding systems) containing antibacterial agents vs Composite restorations not containing antibacterial agents
Secondary caries · Adults and adolescents in any age group with restorations in the permanent dentition and children with restorations in…
Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries (2013) · Cochrane
No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls.0 studiesNo studies
Resin composite restorations (filling and bonding systems) containing antibacterial agents vs Composite restorations not containing antibacterial agents
Costs (direct costs of interventions) · Adults and adolescents in any age group with restorations in the permanent dentition and children with restorations in…
Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries (2013) · Cochrane
No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls.0 studiesNo studies
Laser fluorescence (LF; DIAGNOdent) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, summary-ROC AUC) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR and summary-ROC AUC reported qualitatively (Figure 6); pooled DOR higher for LF (and FC) than for LFpen. Heterogeneity I2=77%. Numeric pooled values not available in the…NRUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
Initial caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with approximal surfaces · Initial caries lesion threshold, LFpen, approximal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Specificity 0.842 [0.756, 0.907]2 studiesUngraded
Stepwise excavation (two-stage caries removal, re-entry after an interval) vs One stage complete caries removal
Pulp exposure during caries removal · Patients with carious teeth, affecting any tooth surface(s), in unrestored primary and permanent teeth · During caries removal, Secondary dentition
Operative caries management in adults and children (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.36, 0.72]3 studies · 454 participantsModerate
Dental care provided by dental health aide therapists (DHATs, mid-level providers) vs Dental care provided by dentists (or no comparison group)
Technical performance / deficient restorations (DHATs vs dentists) · Alaska Native dental patients (children aged 6-17 and adults) and their caregivers · Cross-sectional (DHATs practising ~9 months to several years), Amalgam restorations
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Deficient restorations (%), DHAT vs dentist 12 vs 22 (DHAT vs dentist)2 studiesUngraded
DHAT-delivered dental care vs No comparison group
Clinical care quality · Alaska dental health aide therapists · 9 months
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Four practising DHATs met Indian Health Service guidelines for record keeping and standards of care for cavity preparation and restoration, patient management, and patient safety.1 studyUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen; DIAGNOdent pen) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Relative DOR by reference standard (LFpen, initial, occlusal permanent) · Permanent teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · Initial caries lesions threshold, Other reference standard vs histological (reference)
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
RDOR 4.41 [0.19, 103.92]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Caries occurrence on sealed teeth · 6 months, original datasets only (permanent teeth)
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin… (2013)
RR 1.81 [0.39, 8.37]3 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Risk of loss of complete retention · Main analysis; GIC-based (Mat 2)
Validity of sealant retention as surrogate for caries prevention--a systematic review. (2013)
Mean risk (proportion of sealed teeth) 0.84 (SD 0.19)22 studiesUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
Initial caries lesion detection · Primary teeth with approximal surfaces · Initial caries lesion threshold, LFpen, approximal, primary teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.354 [0.324, 0.385]5 studiesUngraded
A permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of anterior teeth,…
Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane
Main results: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Effects of interventions: No studies met the inclusion criteria.0 studiesNo studies
PDHA program vs Baseline pre-intervention scenario
Clinic-based dental care utilization · Alaska children · 20 years
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percentage-point increase 151 studyUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with occlusal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, LFpen, occlusal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Specificity 0.718 [0.683, 0.751]10 studiesUngraded
Primary dental health aide (PDHA) service-delivery models (PDHA program; PDHA + intensive staffing; PDHA + robust prevention) vs Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario
Projected receipt of school-based prevention services · Alaska Native children (below age 18) · 20-year projection
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Children receiving school-based prevention services (%) >901 studyUngraded
Primary school-based behavioural intervention (both oral hygiene and dietary components) vs No intervention or delayed intervention (non-intervention control; one trial's control received dental treatment plus an annual supervised toothbrushing session)
Change in oral health knowledge and skills · Children aged 4 to 12 years attending primary school
Primary school‐based behavioural interventions for preventing caries (2013) · Cochrane
Worthington 2001 reported changes in oral health knowledge and skills: improvement was apparent in both intervention and control groups at the 4-month follow-up (phase one) but greater in the intervention group (34%…1 studyUngraded
Stepwise excavation (two-stage caries removal, re-entry after an interval) vs One stage complete caries removal
Pulp exposure during caries removal · Patients with carious teeth, affecting any tooth surface(s), in unrestored primary and permanent teeth · During caries removal, Primary dentition
Operative caries management in adults and children (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.31 [0.17, 0.57]2 studies · 173 participantsModerate
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen; DIAGNOdent pen) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, summary-ROC AUC) · Primary teeth, occlusal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR and summary-ROC AUC reported qualitatively (Figure 7); pooled DOR intermediate for LFpen among the three methods. Heterogeneity I2=31%. Numeric pooled values not available…NRUngraded
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing
Interproximal caries · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane
Not estimable. No included study assessed caries as an outcome. (See comment)0 studiesNo studies
DHAT-delivered dental care vs Dentist-delivered dental care
Amalgam restoration deficiency · Alaska dental health aide therapists
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Proportion of deficient amalgam restorations 12% vs 22%2 studiesUngraded
Stepwise excavation (two-stage caries removal, re-entry after an interval) vs One stage complete caries removal
Signs or symptoms of pulpal disease · Patients with carious teeth, affecting any tooth surface(s), in unrestored primary and permanent teeth · 1 year
Operative caries management in adults and children (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.78 [0.39, 1.58]2 studies · 278 participantsModerate
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen; DIAGNOdent pen) vs Reference standard (histological examination, operative intervention, or other/visual examination)
Diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, summary-ROC AUC) · Permanent teeth, approximal surfaces, with suspected caries lesions · More advanced (dentine/cavitated) caries lesions threshold
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR and summary-ROC AUC reported qualitatively (Figure 8); LFpen showed similar values at both thresholds. Heterogeneity I2=84%. Numeric pooled values not available in the…NRUngraded
DHAT-delivered dental care vs Dentist-delivered dental care
Caregiver satisfaction · Caregivers of Alaska Native children aged 6 to 17 years
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Proportion usually or always satisfied >90%1 studyUngraded
Pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) vs Reference standard
More advanced caries lesion detection · Primary teeth with occlusal surfaces · More advanced caries lesion threshold, LFpen, occlusal, primary teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Specificity 0.864 [0.834, 0.890]5 studiesUngraded
Laser fluorescence (LF) vs Reference standard
Initial caries lesion detection · Permanent teeth with occlusal surfaces · Initial caries lesion threshold, LF, occlusal, permanent teeth
Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of… (2013)
Sensitivity 0.779 [0.763, 0.794]27 studiesUngraded