Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

5,762 questions in 263 reviews · Dental caries

current versions
No studies 321 · 5.6%Ungraded 4,450 · 77.2%Very low 455 · 7.9%Low 297 · 5.2%Moderate 200 · 3.5%High 39 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment on permanent tooth surfaces (D(M)FS), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition) · Nearest to 3 years, No-treatment-controlled trials
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.38 [0.24, 0.52]10 studies · 2808 participantsUngraded
Fluoride toothpaste containing 10% xylitol vs Fluoride toothpaste (fluoride-only, no xylitol)
Caries increment (DFS), prevented fraction at 2.5 to 3 years · Children with permanent teeth (schoolchildren) · 2.5 to 3 years
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.13 [0.08, 0.18]2 studies · 4216 participantsLow
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse vs Placebo or no intervention (including routine care)
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
There were no trials on other products containing chlorhexidine such as sprays, toothpastes, chewing gums or mouthrinses.0 studiesNo studies
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive measures (e.g. fluoride varnish, flossing/oral hygiene advice), no treatment, or placebo
Caries (lesion) progression measured by pairwise reading of radiographs · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 18 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up)
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.31 [0.18, 0.53]4 studiesModerate
Initiation of water fluoridation (artificial or natural) vs Low/non-fluoridated water (0.4 ppm fluoride or less)
Disparities in caries across socioeconomic status (SES) · People of all ages in a community setting; the included caries studies were all in children aged 3 to 16 years
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
There is insufficient information to determine whether initiation of a water fluoridation programme results in a change in disparities in caries levels across SES. Data from 3 observational studies (participants not…3 studies · 35399 participantsLow
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
Catastrophic failure of the restored tooth or restoration leading directly to extraction · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment · 3 years
Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane
SoF 'Catastrophic failure of restoration': assumed risk (conventional filling) 0, corresponding risk (single crown) 0; no events in either group so a relative effect was not estimable; 117 participants (1 study); GRADE…1 study · 117 participantsVery low
Fluoridated milk vs Non-fluoridated milk
Requirement for general anaesthesia due to dental procedures for caries · General population, irrespective of age or level of risk for dental caries
Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No evidence found. (No information was reported by the included study.)0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Unacceptability of treatment (dropouts/exclusions during the trial) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger · During trial, No-treatment-controlled trials
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.73, 1.47]8 studies · 2628 participantsUngraded
Xylitol syrup (high dose, 8 g/day) vs Control (low-dose xylitol, 2.67 g/day) syrup
Caries in primary teeth (mean number of decayed primary teeth) · Infants (primary teeth; baseline about 9 to 15 months) · 12 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.58 [0.33, 0.83]1 study · 94 participantsLow
Xylitol wipes (4.2 g/day) vs Control wipes (no xylitol)
Number of infants with a caries increment (dmfs) · Infants (primary teeth) · 12 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.14 [0.02, 1.07]1 study · 44 participantsLow
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Major failure · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Short term (less than 12 months)
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Short term (less than 12 months): no failures in either group; effect not estimable (Analysis 1.1.1; 76 teeth, 38 participants; one study, Hutcheson 2012).1 study · 76 participantsUngraded
Initiation of water fluoridation (artificial or natural) vs Low/non-fluoridated water (0.4 ppm fluoride or less)
Change in proportion of caries-free children (permanent teeth) · People of all ages in a community setting; the included caries studies were all in children aged 3 to 16 years · Follow-up 8 to 12 years
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
MD 0.14 [0.05, 0.23]8 studies · 53538 participantsLow
Resin sealant (one micro-invasive treatment) vs Resin infiltration (another micro-invasive treatment)
Caries (lesion) progression (radiographic) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · up to 3 years
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Only one study (Martignon 2012) directly compared resin sealant versus resin infiltration; the review could not determine which technique is more advantageous and reported no direct effect estimate for this comparison.1 studyUngraded
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Time to restoration failure/retreatment · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
The studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Major failure · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · 12 months
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.12 [0.01, 2.18]1 study · 92 participantsVery low
Fluoridated milk vs Non-fluoridated milk
Dental pain due to decay · General population, irrespective of age or level of risk for dental caries
Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No evidence found. (No information was reported by the included study.)0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs No treatment
Pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or costs · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
Neither of these trials reported on the other secondary outcomes such as measures of pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or direct and indirect costs of interventions.0 studiesNo studies
Xylitol lozenges (4.7 g/day) vs No treatment
Caries increment (DMFS) · Children (permanent teeth; baseline 8 to 10 years) · 24 months (48-month follow-up)
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
PF -0.10 [-0.59, 0.39]1 study · 200 participantsVery low
Xylitol lozenges (5 g/day) vs Control lozenges (sucralose-sweetened placebo, no xylitol)
Adverse effects (sores in the mouth, cramps, bloating, constipation, flatulence, loose stool or diarrhoea) · Adults · 33 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
Patterns of adverse effects (sores in the mouth, cramps, bloating, constipation, flatulence, and loose stool or diarrhoea) were similar for both groups. Bader 2013.1 study · 669 participantsUngraded
Xylitol tablets (200 to 600 mg/day) via slow-release pacifier/dummy vs Control (sorbitol) tablets
Number of infants with a caries increment (dmfs) · Infants (primary teeth; from about 1 month of age) · 24 months (48-month follow-up)
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 3.08 [0.69, 13.65]1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Fluoridated milk vs Non-fluoridated milk
Antibiotics due to dental infections · General population, irrespective of age or level of risk for dental caries
Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No evidence found. (No information was reported by the included study.)0 studiesNo studies
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Discomfort associated with the procedure · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Immediately after treatment
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.67 [0.65, 4.25]1 study · 104 participantsVery low
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive measures (e.g. fluoride varnish, flossing/oral hygiene advice), no treatment, or placebo
Adverse events · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 1 to 3 years
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
The four studies that measured adverse events reported no adverse events after micro-invasive treatment (no events in either arm)4 studiesUngraded
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Tooth staining · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
None of the studies reported on staining of tooth surfaces (not even Gisselsson 1999, the only trial testing stannous fluoride).0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine varnish (10% and 40%) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment in permanent dentition (DMFS; higher values indicate greater caries) · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with… · 30 to 36 months, permanent dentition
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
MD 0.53 [-0.47, 1.53]2 studies · 690 participantsVery low
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive measures (e.g. fluoride varnish, flossing/oral hygiene advice), no treatment, or placebo
Caries (lesion) progression (radiographic; most sensitive measure per study, DSR > pairwise > visual scoring) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up)
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.24 [0.14, 0.41]7 studies · 365 participantsModerate
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Signs of acute toxicity during gel application (nausea, gagging, vomiting) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger · During gel application
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
RD 0.01 [-0.01, 0.02]2 studies · 490 participantsVery low
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive measures (e.g. fluoride varnish, flossing/oral hygiene advice), no treatment, or placebo
Change in decayed, missing and filled (DMF/dmf) figures at surface, tooth and whole mouth level · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in…
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
No studies reported on caries measured as change in decayed, missing and filled (DMF/dmf) figures at surface, tooth or whole mouth level0 studiesNo studies
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
Periodontal health status · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane
No data were reported nor measured by the study. The abstract confirms no evidence was available for any secondary outcome.NRNo studies
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Proportion of children developing new caries · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition)
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.68, 0.99]1 study · 280 participantsUngraded
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
Non-catastrophic failure of the post · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment · 3 years
Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.96 [0.18, 21.01]1 study · 117 participantsVery low
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
Incidence or recurrence of caries (assessed clinically or by radiographs) · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane
No data were reported nor measured by the study. The abstract confirms no evidence was available for any secondary outcome.NRNo studies
Breastfeeding vs Bottle feeding
Presence of dental caries · Children with exclusively primary dentition (age ≤71 months)
Breast and Bottle Feeding as Risk Factors for Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2015)
OR 0.43 [0.23, 0.80]2 studies · 620 participantsUngraded
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive measures (e.g. fluoride varnish, flossing/oral hygiene advice), no treatment, or placebo
Caries (lesion) progression measured by digital subtraction radiography (DSR) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 18 months (radiographic follow-up)
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.18 [0.06, 0.50]3 studiesModerate
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive measures (e.g. fluoride varnish, flossing/oral hygiene advice), no treatment, or placebo
Caries (lesion) progression measured by radiographic scoring · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 30 months (radiographic follow-up)
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.27 [0.17, 0.44]5 studiesModerate
Cessation of water fluoridation (fluoride removed from the water supply) vs Continued fluoridated water
Caries in deciduous teeth (dmft/dmfs) · People of all ages in a previously fluoridated community (Maupome 2001: children with generally low caries experience)
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No evidence to determine the effect of the cessation of water fluoridation on caries in deciduous teeth. No included study reported change in dmft following cessation.0 studiesNo studies
Higher water fluoride concentration (fluoridated water; natural or artificial) vs Lower water fluoride concentration (concurrent control)
Dental fluorosis of any level (all severities) · Populations of all ages (mostly children) exposed to drinking water with differing fluoride concentrations · Cross-sectional
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
OR 3.60 [2.86, 4.53]90 studies · 180530 participantsLow
Chlorhexidine spray vs Placebo or no intervention (including routine care)
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
There were no trials on other products containing chlorhexidine such as sprays, toothpastes, chewing gums or mouthrinses.0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine toothpaste vs Placebo or no intervention (including routine care)
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
There were no trials on other products containing chlorhexidine such as sprays, toothpastes, chewing gums or mouthrinses.0 studiesNo studies
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Major failure · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Long term (12 months to 48 months)
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.18 [0.06, 0.56]3 studies · 346 participantsModerate
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment on permanent tooth surfaces (D(M)FS), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition) · Nearest to 3 years
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.28 [0.19, 0.36]25 studies · 8479 participantsModerate
Xylitol sucking tablets (1 g/day) vs No treatment
Caries increment (dmfs) · Infants/young children (primary teeth; baseline about 1 to 3 years) · 18 months (24-month follow-up)
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.53 [0.001, 1.04]1 study · 118 participantsVery low
Cessation of water fluoridation (fluoride removed from the water supply) vs Continued fluoridated water
Caries in permanent teeth (DMFS) · People of all ages in a previously fluoridated community (Maupome 2001: children with generally low caries experience) · Follow-up 3 years
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
Insufficient evidence to determine the effect of the cessation of water fluoridation on caries. One study (Maupome 2001), at high risk of bias, over 3 years found no increase in caries in the fluoride-ended group…1 study · 9249 participantsVery low
Resin sealant (with or without flossing advice) vs Flossing advice (non-invasive control)
Caries (lesion) progression (radiographic) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up), Resin sealant
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.33 [0.18, 0.59]2 studiesUngraded
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
Non-catastrophic failure of the restoration (requiring further treatment) · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment · 3 years
Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.04, 3.05]1 study · 117 participantsVery low
Down syndrome (trisomy 21) vs Individuals without Down syndrome (healthy controls: siblings, schoolchildren or others)
Dental caries (presence vs absence; all teeth, deciduous and permanent) · Individuals of any age (no age limit; ages 1 to 84 years across studies)
Association between Dental Caries and Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2015)
OR 0.36 [0.22, 0.57]2 studies · 314 participantsUngraded
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Satisfaction with treatment · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Satisfaction with treatment: No evidence available (Summary of findings 2).0 studiesNo studies
Xylitol lozenges (4.7 g/day) vs No treatment
Number of children with a caries increment · Children (permanent teeth; baseline 8 to 10 years) · 24 months (48-month follow-up)
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.83, 1.26]1 study · 200 participantsUngraded
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration) vs Conventional invasive treatment (restoration / drill and fill)
Outcome NR · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in…
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
No studies compared micro-invasive treatments with invasive treatment (fillings)0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs No treatment
Presence of new caries in the primary teeth · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with… · 24 months, primary dentition
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.36, 2.77]2 studies · 487 participantsVery low