Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

5,762 questions in 263 reviews · Dental caries

current versions
No studies 321 · 5.6%Ungraded 4,450 · 77.2%Very low 455 · 7.9%Low 297 · 5.2%Moderate 200 · 3.5%High 39 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Enamel surface properties (thinner, softer enamel) in exfoliated teeth · By race/ethnicity
Social-Biological Interactions in Oral Disease: A 'Cells to Society' View. (2016)
Narrative (no effect size) Higher salivary cortisol reactivity associated with thinner, softer enamel surfaces1 studyUngraded
Adhesively bonded amalgam restorations in conventional preparations utilising deliberate retention (all bonding agents) vs Traditional non‐bonded amalgam restorations
Post‐insertion sensitivity or pain assessed by a validated pain scale · Adults and adolescents with permanent posterior molar and premolar teeth suitable for Class I and II, but excluding… · Baseline and 24 months
Adhesively bonded versus non‐bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries (2016) · Cochrane
Post‐insertion sensitivity or pain assessed by a validated pain scale - not measured | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | - | See comment | No study addressed this outcome1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures · Children with fully erupted permanent first molar teeth (mean age about 6 to 8 years) · 36 months
Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent… (2016)
RR 0.90 [0.49, 1.67]3 studies · 600 evaluated sealed teeth participantsUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Need for anaesthesia · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · during treatment, overall (children and adults)
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.37 [0.19, 0.72]4 studies · 320 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Dental caries prevalence in permanent teeth (cavitated lesions) · Children aged 11-13 years in Latin America and the Caribbean · Studies with data collected after 2000 (21st century)
Does the Decline in Caries Prevalence of Latin American and Caribbean Children Continue in the New Century?… (2016)
Prevalence 0.58 [0.54, 0.61]63 studies · 95188 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse (any fluoride agent, concentration, volume, frequency or technique; swished and expectorated, not swallowed) vs Placebo or no treatment
Proportion of children not remaining caries-free · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or younger at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year
Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
None of the trials reported data on the proportion of children not remaining caries-free.0 studiesNo studies
High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures · Children with fully erupted permanent first molar teeth (mean age about 6 to 8 years) · 24 months
Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent… (2016)
RR 1.36 [0.66, 2.78]4 studies · 1742 evaluated sealed teeth participantsUngraded
Low socioeconomic position and adverse behavioural factors vs Higher socioeconomic position and fewer adverse behaviours
Systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein) and periodontal disease progression · General-population adults (German cohort) · 5-year follow-up
Social-Biological Interactions in Oral Disease: A 'Cells to Society' View. (2016)
no estimate extracted1 study · 3300 participantsUngraded
Dementia vs Older people without dementia
Missing teeth · Older people with dementia
Oral health and orofacial pain in older people with dementia: a systematic review with focus on dental hard… (2016)
MEAN Without dementia 9.3 to 28.2; with dementia 10.2 to 27.3 (mean number of missing teeth)10 studiesUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Need for anaesthesia · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · during treatment, children/adolescents
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.25 [0.10, 0.65]3 studies · 217 participantsLow
Fluoride mouthrinse (any fluoride agent, concentration, volume, frequency or technique; swished and expectorated, not swallowed) vs Placebo or no treatment
Tooth staining/discolouration (adverse effect) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or younger at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year
Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
Study 1: "significant difference" in stain score (from the control) in the group using an amine fluoride mouthrinse; "non-significant difference" (from the control) in the group using sodium fluoride. In 2 trials where…3 studiesVery low
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
Costs for the use of different treatment interventions · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane
No data were reported nor measured by the study. The abstract confirms no evidence was available for any secondary outcome.NRNo studies
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment on permanent whole teeth (D(M)FT), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition) · Nearest to 3 years
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.32 [0.19, 0.46]10 studiesUngraded
Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs No treatment
Mutans streptococci prevalence (presence/absence) · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with… · 24 months, primary dentition
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.26 [0.95, 1.66]2 studies · 490 participantsVery low
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment on permanent tooth surfaces (D(M)FS), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition) · Nearest to 3 years, Placebo-controlled trials
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.21 [0.15, 0.28]15 studies · 5671 participantsUngraded
Xylitol lozenges (4.7 g/day) vs No treatment
Adverse effects · Children (permanent teeth; baseline 8 to 10 years) · 24 months (48-month follow-up)
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
There were no usable data presented for adverse effects. Lenkkeri 2012.1 studyUngraded
Fluoride toothpaste containing 10% xylitol vs Fluoride toothpaste (fluoride-only, no xylitol)
Adverse effects · Children with permanent teeth (schoolchildren) · 2.5 to 3 years
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
Adverse effects: both studies reported that there were no adverse effects in either the xylitol or control group.2 studies · 4216 participantsUngraded
Initiation of water fluoridation (artificial or natural) vs Low/non-fluoridated water (0.4 ppm fluoride or less)
Dental caries in adults · Adults · Adults
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No studies that aimed to determine the effectiveness of water fluoridation for preventing caries in adults met the review's inclusion criteria. There are no data to determine the effect of water fluoridation on caries…0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine oral product (one formulation/concentration) vs Another chlorhexidine formulation, concentration or application frequency
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs No treatment
Adverse events · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with… · 24 months, primary dentition
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
Both studies reported there were no adverse events.2 studiesUngraded
Higher water fluoride concentration (fluoridated water; natural or artificial) vs Lower water fluoride concentration (concurrent control)
Dental fluorosis of aesthetic concern (Dean's Index, TFI, TSIF) · Populations of all ages (mostly children) exposed to drinking water with differing fluoride concentrations · Cross-sectional
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
OR 2.90 [2.05, 4.10]40 studies · 59630 participantsLow
Xylitol sucking tablets (1 g/day) vs No treatment
Number of infants with a caries increment · Infants/young children (primary teeth; baseline about 1 to 3 years) · 18 months (24-month follow-up)
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.72 [0.35, 1.45]1 study · 118 participantsUngraded
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Cost · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
The studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Cost · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
The studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Xylitol lozenges (5 g/day) vs Control lozenges (sucralose-sweetened placebo, no xylitol)
Caries increment (DFS) · Adults · 33 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.08 [-0.03, 0.20]1 study · 669 participantsLow
Initiation of water fluoridation (artificial or natural) vs Low/non-fluoridated water (0.4 ppm fluoride or less)
Caries in permanent teeth (change in DMFT) · People of all ages in a community setting; the included caries studies were all in children aged 3 to 16 years · Follow-up 8 to 11 years
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
MD -1.16 [-1.61, -0.72]10 studies · 78764 participantsLow
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Adverse events: gingival bleeding · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Short term (up to 12 months)
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.69 [0.61, 4.66]2 studies · 226 participantsUngraded
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Satisfaction with treatment · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Satisfaction with treatment: listed in the Summary of findings table with no data; the studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Unacceptability of treatment (dropouts/exclusions during the trial) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger · During trial
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.89, 1.19]19 studiesUngraded
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
Patient satisfaction and quality of life (any validated instrument) · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane
This outcome was not reported nor measured by the study. The abstract confirms no evidence was available for any secondary outcome.NRNo studies
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Pain · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Long term (12 months to 24 months)
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.15 [0.04, 0.67]2 studies · 312 participantsModerate
Fluoridated milk vs Non-fluoridated milk
Adverse effects: dental fluorosis · General population, irrespective of age or level of risk for dental caries
Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No evidence found. (Correspondence with the author (Maslak 2004) confirmed that no adverse effects were reported.)0 studiesNo studies
Glass ionomer sealant (with fluoride gel plus dentifrice) vs Fluoride gel plus fluoride toothpaste/dentifrice (non-invasive control)
Caries (lesion) progression (radiographic) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up), Glass ionomer sealant
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.13 [0.01, 2.52]1 studyUngraded
Xylitol syrup (high dose, 8 g/day) vs Control (low-dose xylitol, 2.67 g/day) syrup
Adverse effects (loose stools, diarrhoea) · Infants (primary teeth; baseline about 9 to 15 months) · 12 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
Adverse effects were not reported in a usable format, but the reported rates of loose stools and diarrhoea were very similar between groups. There were no serious adverse effects during the study. Milgrom 2009.1 study · 94 participantsUngraded
Cessation of water fluoridation (fluoride removed from the water supply) vs Continued fluoridated water
Change in proportion of caries-free children (deciduous or permanent teeth) · People of all ages in a previously fluoridated community (Maupome 2001: children with generally low caries experience)
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No evidence to determine the effect of the cessation of water fluoridation on the proportion of caries-free children.0 studiesNo studies
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs No treatment
Outcome NR · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Crown versus no treatment was a planned comparison (Comparison 2: crown versus no crown or filling). No study evaluated crown versus no treatment; the only study in this comparison (Santamaria 2014) used active…0 studiesNo studies
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Pain · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Pain: No evidence available (Summary of findings 2).0 studiesNo studies
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Time to restoration failure/retreatment · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
The studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine varnish vs Placebo or no treatment
Adverse events (e.g. ulcers, tooth staining) · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
One study reported no adverse events for ulcers or tooth staining. One study stated "side-effects due to the CHX treatment were not noted".2 studiesUngraded
Xylitol candy (7.5 g/day) vs Control (sorbitol) candy
Adverse effects · Children (mixed dentition; baseline about 8 years) · 36 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
The authors reported that there were no adverse effects for either group. Honkala 2014.1 study · 252 participantsUngraded
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Mucosal irritation / oral soft-tissue allergic reaction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
None of the studies reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Xylitol candy (7.5 g/day) vs Control (sorbitol) candy
Caries increment (dmfs, primary and permanent teeth combined) · Children (mixed dentition; baseline about 8 years) · 36 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
One study (252 children) compared xylitol (7.5 g/day) candy with control (sorbitol) candy over 36 months. The data could not be used in analysis because the authors combined primary/deciduous and permanent teeth and…1 study · 252 participantsUngraded
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment on permanent whole teeth (D(M)FT), prevented fraction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger (permanent dentition) · Nearest to 3 years, Placebo-controlled trials
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.18 [0.09, 0.27]4 studiesUngraded
Down syndrome (trisomy 21) vs Individuals without Down syndrome (healthy controls: siblings, schoolchildren or others)
Dental caries experience (mean DMFT; permanent teeth) · Individuals of any age (no age limit; ages 1 to 84 years across studies)
Association between Dental Caries and Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2015)
SMD -0.18 [-0.35, -0.02]6 studies · 718 participantsUngraded
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Proportion of children not remaining caries-free · Children with primary (deciduous) teeth (mostly preschool children aged under 6 years) · Primary dentition
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.26, 1.07]1 study · 145 participantsUngraded
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive measures (e.g. fluoride varnish, flossing/oral hygiene advice), no treatment, or placebo
Participant and operator perception · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in…
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
None of the studies reported on participant or operator perception0 studiesNo studies
Adhesive/polyurethane sealant patch vs No treatment (both arms received flossing plus fluoride toothpaste)
Caries (lesion) progression (radiographic) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up), Sealant patch
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.00 [0.14, 7.23]1 studyUngraded
Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive measures (e.g. fluoride varnish, flossing/oral hygiene advice), no treatment, or placebo
Costs (direct treatment costs; indirect costs / time off school or work) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in…
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
None of the studies reported on costs for micro-invasive treatment or non-invasive control0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment on primary (deciduous) tooth surfaces (d(e/m)fs), prevented fraction · Children with primary (deciduous) teeth (mostly preschool children aged under 6 years) · Nearest to 3 years
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.20 [0.01, 0.38]3 studies · 1254 participantsLow
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Discomfort associated with the procedure · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · At time of dental appointment or within 24 hours
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.56 [0.36, 0.87]2 studies · 381 participantsModerate