Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

32 questions · 38 findings · 12 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 13 · 34.2%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 11 · 28.9%Low 9 · 23.7%Moderate 5 · 13.2%High 0 · 0%

Interventions targeting healthcare professionals vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (mental) · healthcare professionals responsible for patient care
2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting healthcare professionals vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (physical) · healthcare professionals responsible for patient care
2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting healthcare professionals and patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (mental) · healthcare professionals and patients
2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting healthcare professionals and patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (physical) · healthcare professionals and patients
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care

Differences in quality of life ( · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life (mean difference) at longest compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs usual or enhanced care

Quality of life ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) SF‐36 social functioning (higher score = higher quality of life) · women with perinatal depression

It is very uncertain whether primary health professional‐led collaborative care interventions changes quality of life ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post… compared with usual or enhanced care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings for the main comparison: comprehensive care programmes vs usual care

Parent health, functioning, and quality of life Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (higher scores = more of the outcome of interest, which can mean improvement or deterioration depending on the outcome) · children with medical complexity
1 finding from 1 review

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (mental) · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (physical) · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Quality of life · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review