Question · asked by 1 review
Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type: Health‐related quality of life (mental)
- Population
- patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients
- Intervention
- Interventions targeting patients
- Comparison
- usual care or interventions of the same type
- Outcome
- Health‐related quality of life (mental)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type Health‐related quality of life (mental) · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type Health‐related quality of life (mental) ( · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 116 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.