Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

15 questions · 16 findings · 9 reviews · Stroke

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 6 · 37.5%GRADE not reported 1 · 6.3%Very low 5 · 31.3%Low 2 · 12.5%Moderate 2 · 12.5%High 0 · 0%

Lipid‐lowering agent vs placebo or no treatment

Quality of life · asymptomatic carotid stenosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Lowered blood pressure vs placebo

Quality of life · people with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for altering blood pressure in people with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Attention training vs control

Quality of life – · people with attention deficits following stroke

2 findings from 1 review

Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 99 participants
Very low
Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 103 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Subjective Health Status score (Assessment of Quality of Life Score 0 to 1; lower = 0; end of scheduled · adults with acute stroke

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes subjective Health Status score (Assessment of Quality of Life Score… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 0.07
1 study · 68 participants
Very low

Environmental enrichment vs standard care following stroke

Secondary outcome: quality of life · adults (aged 18 or older) with a diagnosis of stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Environmental enrichment for stroke and other non‐progressive brain injury 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 53 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measures (long‐term outcome) · patients with memory deficits following stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 134 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measures (immediate outcome) · patients with memory deficits following stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 141 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Quality of life after stroke · participants after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Trunk training following stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 111 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Quality of life after stroke · participants after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Trunk training following stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 108 participants
Very low

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

Quality of life and participation · stroke survivors with vision perception disorders

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

Quality of life and participation · stroke survivors with hearing, smell, and taste perception disorders

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Secondary outcome: quality of life · people within 3 months after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 68 participants
Low

Pharmacological interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Secondary outcome: quality of life · men (aged between 23 and 45) with premature ejaculation within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

Quality of life and participation ‐ mobility and navigation (Analysis 3.1) · stroke survivors with tactile perception disorders

Rehabilitation interventions showed no clear difference in quality of life and participation ‐ mobility and navigation… compared with no treatment or control; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 6.5
2 studies · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

Quality of life and participation ‐ mobility and navigation intervention for not Pusher Syndrome (Analysis 1.2) · stroke survivors with somatosensory perception disorders

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found