Cochrane · systematic review · CD007039
Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke
Hazelton, C, Thomson, K, Todhunter-Brown, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
24
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
21
Included studies
NR
No studies 21 · 87.5%Ungraded 1 · 4.2%Very low 2 · 8.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Show all 2 versionsRehabilitation interventions compared to no treatment or control for hearing, smell, or taste perception disorders
Population: stroke survivors with hearing, smell, and taste perception disorders
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (primary outcome) Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Extended activities of daily living Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of life and participation Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Psychological and mental health Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Perception Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Adverse events Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
CI: confidence interval Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Rehabilitation interventions compared to no treatment or control for somatosensory perception disorders
Population: stroke survivors with somatosensory perception disorders
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living ‐ intervention for not Pusher Syndrome (Analysis 1.1) (primary outcome) Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Extended activities of daily living Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of life and participation ‐ mobility and navigation intervention for not Pusher Syndrome (Analysis 1.2) Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Psychological and mental health Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Perception Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Adverse events Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Rehabilitation interventions compared to no treatment or control for tactile perception disorders
Population: stroke survivors with tactile perception disorders
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (primary outcome) Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Extended activities of daily living Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of life and participation ‐ mobility and navigation (Analysis 3.1) Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | MD 6.5 | 2 studies · 30 participants | Ungraded |
Psychological and mental health Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Perception (Analysis 3.2) Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | MD 4.64 [3.06, 6.21] | 2 studies · 30 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Rehabilitation interventions compared to no treatment or control for vision perception disorders
Population: stroke survivors with vision perception disorders
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (primary outcome) Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Extended activities of daily living (Analysis 5.1) Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of life and participation Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Psychological and mental health Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Perception (Analysis 5.2) Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 27 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Adverse events Rehabilitation interventions vs no treatment or control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |