Cochrane · systematic review · CD002293

Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke

das Nair, R, Cogger, H, Worthington, E, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

StrokeAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 20%Low 2 · 20%Moderate 6 · 60%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Comparison

Population: patients with memory deficits following stroke
10 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Subjective memory measures (immediate outcome)
no estimate extracted7 studies · 215 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Subjective memory measures (long‐term outcome)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 149 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Objective memory measures (immediate outcome) ‐ comprehensive batteries
no estimate extracted5 studies · 91 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Objective memory measures (immediate outcome) ‐ verbal memory sub‐tests
no estimate extracted5 studies · 266 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Objective memory measures (long‐term outcome) ‐ comprehensive batteries
no estimate extracted3 studies · 49 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Functional ability measures (immediate outcome)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 164 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Mood measures (immediate outcome)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 194 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Mood measures (long‐term outcome)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 175 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Quality of life measures (immediate outcome)
no estimate extracted1 study · 141 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Quality of life measures (long‐term outcome)
no estimate extracted1 study · 134 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias