What do systematic reviews say?

Chemotherapy with TKI followed by TKI maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

• Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 146 participants
  Low

Chemotherapy with TKI followed by TKI maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

• Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 1340 participants
  Moderate

Non‐specialist‐led vs specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Non‐specialist‐led showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life, (at 12 months' compared with specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment (low certainty).

• Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 1.06
  605 participants
  Low

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

• Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 486 participants
  Low

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

• Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 890 participants
  High

Chemotherapy with TKI (peptide‐Fc fusion protein) followed by TKI maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Low dietary fat vs usual fat

• Effects of total fat intake on body fatness in adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 40130 participants
  Low

Low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening vs no LDCT screening

Low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life ‐ anxiety Time point: 10 months to 5… compared with no LDCT screening (low certainty).

• Impact of low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer‐related mortality 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 8153 participants
  Low

PAE vs sham

• Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 80 participants
  Moderate

High vs low blood pressure target

It is very uncertain whether high changes quality of life compared with low blood pressure target (very low certainty).

• High versus low blood pressure targets for cardiac surgery while on cardiopulmonary bypass 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.78 [0.3, 2.01]
  1 study · 218 participants
  Very low

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy vs transurethral resection of the prostate

• Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 136 participants
  Moderate

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy vs sham

• Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 347 participants
  Low

Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham

• Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 195 participants
  Moderate

Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) plus visual rehabilitation vs visual rehabilitation alone

• Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 31 participants
  Low

Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs head‐mounted electronic device (HMD)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device (HHD)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs optical device

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

FLUPENTHIXOL vs LOW‐POTENCY ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS

• Flupenthixol versus low‐potency first‐generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

FLUPHENAZINE vs LOW‐POTENCY ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS

• Fluphenazine versus low‐potency first‐generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported