Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

559 questions · 576 findings · 177 reviews

No studies found 140 · 24.3%GRADE not reported 45 · 7.8%Very low 184 · 31.9%Low 131 · 22.7%Moderate 60 · 10.4%High 16 · 2.8%

Community health educational interventions vs control

Early neonatal mortality · developing countries

It is very uncertain whether community health educational interventions changes early neonatal mortality compared with control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs non‐active comparators

Clinical CVD events (CVD mortality and non‐fatal MI) · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease

It is very uncertain whether mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) changes clinical CVD events (CVD mortality and non‐fatal MI) compared with non‐active comparators (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention vs inactive control

All‐cause mortality Up to 28 days post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality Up to 46 days post‐operatively compared with inactive Control (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention vs haemostatically active control

All‐cause mortality Up to 28 days post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia
2 findings from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention vs inactive control

All‐cause mortality Up to 28 days following admission · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality Up to 28 days following admission compared with inactive Control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ LSSS intervention vs regular salt

Stroke mortality (events per 100,000 person‐years) · Adults (general population)

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ LSSS intervention changes stroke mortality (events per 100,000 person‐years) compared with regular salt (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ LSSS intervention vs regular salt

Cardiovascular mortality · Adults (general population)

Summary of findings table ‐ LSSS intervention showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality (events per 100,000 person‐years) compared with regular salt (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention vs inactive control

All‐cause mortality In‐hospital mortality up to 30 days post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality In‐hospital mortality up to 30 days… compared with inactive Control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise vs control

All‐cause mortality at end of intervention (range 2–10 months) · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether exercise changes all‐cause mortality at end of intervention (range 2–10 months) compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes vs usual care

Patient mortality, morbidity or complication rates · health and social care professionals involved in the delivery of health services and patient care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose that meets total daily nutritional requirements vs RUTF using an alternative formulation

Mortality during intervention · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) showed no clear difference in mortality during intervention compared with RUTF using an alternative formulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose that meets total daily nutritional requirements vs an alternative dietary approach

Mortality during intervention · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial

It is very uncertain whether standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose… changes mortality during intervention compared with an alternative dietary approach (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose that meets total daily nutritional requirements vs as a supplement to the usual diet

Mortality during intervention · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (1 study included HIV‐uninfected children; 1 study included HIV‐infected children), all of whom…

It is very uncertain whether standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose… changes mortality during intervention compared with as a supplement to the usual diet (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Moderate vs low protein concentration of human milk fortifier

Mortality during period of therapy · preterm infants

Moderate showed no clear difference in mortality during the intervention period compared with low protein concentration of human milk fortifier; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral zinc supplementation vs no zinc supplementation

All‐cause mortality (between start of intervention and end of · preterm infants

Enteral zinc supplementation may leads to lower all‐cause mortality (between start of intervention and end of compared with no zinc supplementation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complete revascularisation vs culprit‐only revascularisation

Long‐term all‐cause mortality (≥ 1 year after the intervention) · people with STEMI and MVD.

It is very uncertain whether complete revascularisation changes long‐term all‐cause mortality (≥ 1 year after the intervention) compared with culprit‐only revascularisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complete revascularisation vs culprit‐only revascularisation

Cardiovascular mortality · people with STEMI and MVD.

It is very uncertain whether complete revascularisation changes long‐term cardiovascular mortality (≥ 1 year after the intervention) compared with culprit‐only revascularisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review