Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 4 reviews · Gut

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 14.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 85.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Laparoscopic vs open transhiatal oesophagectomy

Adverse events (proportion) · patients with oesophageal cancer

It is very uncertain whether laparoscopic changes adverse events (proportion) compared with open transhiatal oesophagectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.64 [0.48, 0.86]
3 studies · 213 participants
Very low

Laparoscopic vs open transhiatal oesophagectomy

Serious adverse events (proportion) · patients with oesophageal cancer

It is very uncertain whether laparoscopic changes serious adverse events (proportion) compared with open transhiatal oesophagectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.49 [0.24, 0.99]
3 studies · 213 participants
Very low

Laparoscopic fundoplication vs medical management

Adverse events · Patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic fundoplication surgery versus medical management for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Laparoscopic fundoplication vs medical management

Serious adverse events · Patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults

It is very uncertain whether laparoscopic fundoplication changes serious adverse events compared with medical management (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic fundoplication surgery versus medical management for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.46 [1.01, 2.11]
2 studies · 637 participants
Very low

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy vs open distal pancreatectomy

Adverse events (proportion) · patients with pancreatic cancer

It is very uncertain whether laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy changes adverse events (proportion) compared with open distal pancreatectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.95 [0.54, 1.66]
4 studies · 246 participants
Very low

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy vs open distal pancreatectomy

Serious adverse events (proportion) · patients with pancreatic cancer

It is very uncertain whether laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy changes serious adverse events (proportion) compared with open distal pancreatectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.79 [0.53, 6.06]
3 studies · 206 participants
Very low

Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Serious adverse events · people with mild acute gallstone pancreatitis

It is very uncertain whether early changes serious adverse events compared with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.81]
1 study · 50 participants
Very low