Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

557 questions · 600 findings · 75 reviews

No studies found 188 · 31.3%GRADE not reported 62 · 10.3%Very low 154 · 25.7%Low 122 · 20.3%Moderate 62 · 10.3%High 12 · 2%

Surgery vs any Medical Therapy

NON ‐ Healing (persistence or recurrence) · people with anal fissures

Any Surgery leads to lower NON ‐ Healing (persistence or recurrence) compared with any Medical Therapy (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs surgery

Survival (overall and disease‐ specific) · women with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery changes survival (overall and disease‐ specific) compared with standard surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs surgery

Progression‐free survival · women with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery changes progression‐free survival compared with standard surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs surgery

Disease-free survival · women with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery changes disease‐free survival compared with standard surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs surgery

Perioperative mortality · women with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery changes adverse event: perioperative mortality compared with standard surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs surgery

Adverse event: serious postoperative morbidity · women with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery changes adverse event: serious postoperative morbidity compared with standard surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone

Mean change in medications Measured by number of bottles · patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma

Combined surgery showed no clear difference in mean change in medications Measured by number of bottles compared with phacoemulsification alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone

Need for additional surgery: proportion of participants who received additional surgery to control IOP at 1 year · patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma

Combined surgery showed no clear difference in proportion who received re‐operation to control IOP within one year… compared with phacoemulsification alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone

Proportion who received intervention for surgical complications within one year Number of participants · patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma

Combined surgery showed no clear difference in proportion who received intervention for surgical complications… compared with phacoemulsification alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review