Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,919 questions · 13,869 findings · 2,177 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 13,869 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Antibiotics vs other antibiotics

All‐cause mortality ‐ not reported · farmworkers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention

Serious adverse event ‐ not reported · people with leptospirosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotics for treatment of leptospirosis 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction vs Billroth II reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · people undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction vs Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

Change in weight (kg) · people undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction vs Billroth II reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

Incidence of oesophagitis · people undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction vs Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · people undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Psychosocial interventions vs treatment

Adverse events ‐ not measured · stopping or reducing alcohol consumption during pregnancy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial and medication interventions to stop or reduce alcohol consumption during pregnancy 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Psychosocial interventions vs treatment

Withdrawal signs and symptoms ‐ not measured · stopping or reducing alcohol consumption during pregnancy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial and medication interventions to stop or reduce alcohol consumption during pregnancy 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Effects of extensive instructions vs simple instructions

Proportion of workers who wear HPDs · workers exposed to noise using HPDs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers’ exposure to noise 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Effects of instructions vs No special instructions (control)

PAR pass rate (%) · workers exposed to noise using earplugs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers’ exposure to noise 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Effects of instructions vs No special instructions (control)

Adverse effects · workers exposed to noise using earplugs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers’ exposure to noise 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Effects of instructions vs No special instructions (control)

Proportion of workers who wear HPDs · workers exposed to noise using earplugs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers’ exposure to noise 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Effects of extensive instructions vs simple instructions

Adverse effects · workers exposed to noise using HPDs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers’ exposure to noise 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

tDCS vs sham tDCS

Word retrieval · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training

Overall language abilities · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training

Cognitive function · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training

Quality of life · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

Overall language abilities · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

Cognitive function · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

Quality of life · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found