Cochrane · systematic review · CD014960

Antibiotics for treatment of leptospirosis

Win, TZ, Han, SM, Edwards, T, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
12
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 8.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 11 · 91.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics compared with placebo or no intervention for treatment of leptospirosis

Population: people with leptospirosis
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
All‐cause mortality
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
RR 1.57 [0.65, 3.79]3 studies · 367 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serious adverse event ‐ not reported
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events considered non‐serious
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs placebo or no intervention
RR 1.05 [0.35, 3.17]2 studies · 162 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics compared with other antibiotics for people with leptospirosis

Population: people with leptospirosis
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
All‐cause mortality (penicillin versus a cephalosporin (cefotaxime or ceftriaxone))
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
RR 1.38 [0.47, 4.04]2 studies · 348 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
All‐cause mortality (penicillin versus doxycycline)
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
RR 0.93 [0.13, 6.46]1 study · 168 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
All‐cause mortality (a cephalosporin (cefotaxime) versus doxycycline)
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
RR 0.18 [0.01, 3.78]1 study · 169 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serious adverse events (nosocomial infection) (penicillin versus cefotaxime)
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
RR 1.01 [0.15, 7.02]1 study · 175 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serious adverse events (nosocomial infection) (penicillin versus doxycycline)
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
RR 0.62 [0.11, 3.62]1 study · 168 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serious adverse events (nosocomial infection) (doxycycline versus cefotaxime)
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
RR 1.01 [0.15, 7.02]1 study · 175 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events considered non‐serious (penicillin versus cefotaxime)
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
RR 3.03 [0.13, 73.47]1 study · 175 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events considered non‐serious (penicillin versus doxycycline)
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
RR 2.8 [0.12, 67.66]1 study · 168 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events considered non‐serious (penicillin versus chloramphenicol)
Summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics vs other antibiotics
RR 0.74 [0.15, 3.67]1 study · 52 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision