Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,929 questions · 15,213 findings · 2,394 reviews

No studies found 15,213 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Any (current minimally invasive techniques)

Not applicable (no eligible studies) · Adults with coronal (crown) dental caries in permanent teeth

No eligible studies assessed SDF for coronal caries in adults; this is an evidence gap identified by the review.

1 finding from 1 review

Fibre-reinforced composite fixed (bonded) retainer vs Multistrand / spiral wire fixed (bonded) retainer

Adverse effects on oral health: Gingival Index (lower arch) · People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Side effects or other adverse events · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Living with HIV and undergoing antiretroviral therapy (ART/HAART) vs Healthy HIV-negative controls

Kaposi's sarcoma (WHO clinical stage 4) · Children or adolescents

No eligible studies reported Kaposi's sarcoma.

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional screening (referral card given if the inspecting dentist judges the child needs to see a dentist) vs No screening

Proportion of children with treated/untreated caries (receipt of dental care) · School children (aged 4 to 15 years), primary and secondary schools in the UK and India

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional screening (referral card given if the inspecting dentist judges the child needs to see a dentist) vs No screening

Developmental defects of enamel measured by any validated index · School children (aged 4 to 15 years), primary and secondary schools in the UK and India

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral care vs No oral care

Outcome not reported · Residents of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Any preprocedural mouth rinse vs Placebo, no rinsing or control

Adverse events such as transient discolouration, altered taste, allergic reaction, hypersensitivity · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Any preprocedural mouth rinse vs Placebo, no rinsing or control

Incidence of infection of dental healthcare providers · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Periodontal treatment: scaling and root planing (SRP) plus advice vs Community care: advice only

All CVD-related death · Patients with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Full-mouth disinfection (FMD): scaling/root planing (subgingival instrumentation) of all quadrants within 24 hours plus adjunctive antiseptic (chlorhexidine) treatments (rinsing, pocket irrigation, tongue/tonsil brushing) vs Quadrant scaling and root planing (control): SRP of each quadrant in separate sessions at least one week apart

Tooth loss · Adults with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis (1999 classification); studies of aggressive periodontitis, systemic disorders…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) vs Monotherapy or dual antiretroviral therapy

Angular cheilitis prevalence · Children and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH)

No eligible studies compared angular cheilitis between different ART regimens.

1 finding from 1 review