Cochrane · intervention · CD002283

Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces

Martin, C, Littlewood, SJ, Millett, DT, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Oral HealthOrthodontics5 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
33
current version
GRADE rated
17
No studies
11
Included studies
47
as reported
No studies 11 · 33.3%Ungraded 5 · 15.2%Very low 15 · 45.5%Low 2 · 6.1%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren and adults who have had retainers fitted or adjunctive procedures undertaken following treatment with orthodontic braces. There was no restriction for the presenting malocclusion or type of active orthodontic treatment undertaken. The participants had to be followed up at least three months after completing their orthodontic treatment. Excluded: people who had surgical correction of the jaws; people with a cleft lip or palate, or both, or other craniofacial syndrome; people who had orthodontic treatment based on extractions alone or the fitting of a passive space maintainer, or bothForty-seven studies were identified that fulfilled the criteria of the review. All studies were parallel randomised controlled trials. Forty-seven studies were parallel-design studies and one was a cross-over clinical study. Thirty-eight studies were two-arm studies, seven were three-arm studies, and three were four-arm studies
InterventionRetainers or adjunctive procedures, or both, after treatment with orthodontic braces. We included only studies where the full course of definitive orthodontic treatment was completed - we excluded data on retention strategies at the end of an initial phase of removable or functional appliance treatment. We excluded studies comparing techniques (not materials) for placing the bonded retainers. We did not include studies on aligners in this reviewCircumferential supracrestal fiberotomy and removable retainer (n=2); Three types of fixed retainers and removable retainer (n=1); Hawley removable retainer (n=1); Multistrand wire versus direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite for lingual retention (n=1); Modified thermoplastic retainer versus full coverage thermoplastic retainer (n=1); Part-time versus full-time wear of thermoplastic retainers (n=2); Begg retainers versus thermoplastic retainers (n=1); Hawley retainers versus thermoplastic retainers (n=10); Part-time versus full-time wear of Hawley retainers (n=1); Different types of fixed retainers (n=25); Lower multistrand stainless steel versus lower thermoplastic (n=2); Upper removable and lower fixed retainer versus upper removable retainer and lower adjunctive procedure (n=1); Upper removable and lower fixed retainer versus positioner (n=1)
ComparisonFixed retainers/Removable retainers/No retainers/Hard tissue adjunctive procedures/Soft tissue adjunctive proceduresRemovable retainer full time (n=2); Removable retainer nights only (n=1); Clear overlay removable retainer (n=1); Direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite (n=1); Full coverage thermoplastic retainer (n=1); Full-time wear of thermoplastic retainers (n=2); Thermoplastic retainers (n=1); Hawley retainers (n=10); Full-time wear of Hawley retainers (n=1); Multistrand bonded retainers (n=25); Lower thermoplastic (n=2); Upper removable retainer and lower adjunctive procedure (n=1); Positioner (n=1)
OutcomesAssessment of how well the teeth were stabilised using index of tooth irregularity (e.g. Little's index) or how the teeth meet together using index such as PAR index at least 3 months after fitting of retainer; Survival of the retainers assessed by how long they lasted without breaking (in months) or how many times they needed to be replaced or repaired during wear; Quality of life assessed in terms of patient's satisfaction; Adverse effects on health of teeth (decay assessed using indices of demineralisation) and surrounding structures (gums and other supporting structures assessed using periodontal indices or other markers of periodontal disease)Assessment of stability (n=27); Survival of retainers (n=27); Patient satisfaction (n=14); Adverse effects on oral health (n=15)
Study designsRandomised controlled trialsNR
TimingAt least 3 months after the fitting of the retainer and/or after adjunctive procedure was carried outAt 1 year after debond (n=1); After 3 months (n=1); Over 3 years (n=1); Over 6 months (n=1); Over 2 years (n=1); Three months (n=17); Six months (n=25); Nine months (n=5); One year (n=20); 18 months (n=4); Two years (n=8); Three years (n=1); Four years (n=1); Five years (n=1); Six years (n=1)

Search date: April 2022. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health Trials Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; OpenGrey

Questions and results

Show all 5 versions

Hawley removable retainer vs Clear plastic removable retainer

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
MD 0.01 [-0.65, 0.67]
0.01 [-0.65, 0.67] mm
1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Survival of retainers (failure, upper and lower arches)
12 months · upper and lower arches
RR 0.60 [0.43, 0.83]1 study · 111 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Patient satisfaction: comfort (VAS, upper and lower arches)
12 months · upper and lower arches
No RCTs at 12 months; 1 RCT at 6 months: Hawley less comfortable (VAS MD -1.86, 95% CI -2.19 to -1.53; very low-certainty)0 studiesNo studies
Adverse effects on oral health
12 months · lower arch
Not measured0 studiesNo studies

Fibre-reinforced composite fixed (bonded) retainer vs Multistrand / spiral wire fixed (bonded) retainer

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Patient satisfaction: aesthetics (VAS 0-10 cm, lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
MD 1.49 [0.76, 2.22]
1.49 [0.76, 2.22] VAS points
1 study · 32 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Survival of retainers (failure, lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
RR 1.01 [0.84, 1.21]7 studies · 1337 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Adverse effects on oral health: bleeding on probing (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
No RCTs at 12-month follow-up; 1 RCT at 6 months found no difference (very low-certainty)0 studiesNo studies
Survival: mean survival time (lower arch, months)
12 months · lower arch
No RCTs at 12-month follow-up; 2 RCTs at 24 months: earlier failures with fibre-reinforced composite (MD -1.48, 95% CI -1.88 to -1.08; very low-certainty)0 studiesNo studies
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
MD -0.70 [-1.17, -0.23]
-0.70 [-1.17, -0.23] mm
1 study · 52 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Adverse effects on oral health: Gingival Index (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
No RCTs at 12-month follow-up; 1 RCT at 6 months: higher gingival inflammation with fibre-reinforced composite (MD 0.59, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.05; very low-certainty)0 studiesNo studies

Full-time clear plastic (removable) retainer vs Any type of fixed (bonded) retainer

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Survival of retainers (failure, lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
RR 3.42 [1.38, 8.47]1 study · 77 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Patient satisfaction: discomfort/pain (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
No studies measured or reported this outcome0 studiesNo studies
Adverse effects on oral health: gingival bleeding (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
RR 0.53 [0.31, 0.88]1 study · 84 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
MD 0.60 [0.17, 1.03]
0.60 [0.17, 1.03] mm
1 study · 84 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Adverse effects on oral health: caries (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
RD 0.00 [-0.05, 0.05]
0.00 [-0.05, 0.05] proportion
1 study · 84 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias

Full-time wear of clear plastic (thermoplastic) removable retainer vs Part-time wear of clear plastic (thermoplastic) removable retainer

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index
12 months · upper and lower arches
no estimate extracted3 studiesUngraded

Full-time wear of removable retainer (any type) vs Part-time wear of removable retainer (any type)

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Patient satisfaction
12 months · lower arch
Not measured0 studiesNo studies
Adverse effects on oral health
12 months · lower arch
Not measured0 studiesNo studies
Survival of retainers
12 months · lower arch
Not measured0 studiesNo studies
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
MD 0.20 [-0.28, 0.68]
0.20 [-0.28, 0.68] mm
1 study · 52 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias

Upper clear plastic retainer + lower fixed canine-to-canine retainer vs Upper clear plastic retainer + lower interproximal reduction (adjunctive), no lower retainer

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (lower arch)
2 years · lower arch
MD -0.30 [-0.73, 0.13]1 study · 47 participantsUngraded

Upper clear plastic retainer + lower fixed canine-to-canine retainer vs Positioner

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (lower arch)
2 years · lower arch
MD -1.00 [-1.65, -0.35]1 study · 46 participantsUngraded

Upper clear plastic retainer + lower interproximal reduction (adjunctive) vs Positioner

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (lower arch)
2 years · lower arch
MD -0.70 [-1.37, -0.03]1 study · 45 participantsUngraded

Part-time clear plastic (removable) retainer vs Any type of fixed (bonded) retainer

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
MD 0.92 [0.23, 1.61]
0.92 [0.23, 1.61] mm
1 study · 56 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Survival of retainers (failure, lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
RR 0.44 [0.20, 0.98]1 study · 57 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Adverse effects on oral health: Gingival Index (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
MD -0.34 [-0.66, -0.02]
-0.34 [-0.66, -0.02] index points
1 study · 59 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Patient satisfaction: discomfort/pain (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
RR 12.22 [1.69, 88.52]1 study · 57 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias

CAD/CAM nitinol fixed (bonded) retainer vs Conventional/analogue multistrand fixed (bonded) retainer

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Patient satisfaction: discomfort/pain (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
No studies measured or reported this outcome0 studiesNo studies
Survival of retainers (failure, lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
RR 1.29 [0.67, 2.49]1 study · 41 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Adverse effects on oral health: Gingival Index (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
MD 0.00 [-0.16, 0.16]
0.00 [-0.16, 0.16] index points
2 studies · 107 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Adverse effects on oral health: bleeding on probing (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
No RCTs at 12-month follow-up; 2 RCTs at 6 months found no difference (low-certainty)0 studiesNo studies
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (lower arch)
12 months · lower arch
MD -0.46 [-0.72, -0.21]
-0.46 [-0.72, -0.21] mm
1 study · 66 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias

Upper fixed (bonded) retainer vs No retention

Population: People who had received fixed appliance orthodontic treatment
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Stability: Little's Irregularity Index (upper arch)
2 years · upper arch
MD -0.90 [-1.33, -0.47]1 study · 63 participantsUngraded