Question · asked by 1 review

Light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment: Side effects or other adverse events

Population
Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment
Intervention
Light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation
Comparison
Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment
Outcome
Side effects or other adverse events

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment
Harms and side effects arising during treatment · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Non‐surgical adjunctive interventions for accelerating tooth movement in patients undergoing orthodontic… (2023) · Cochrane All outcomes
Harms and side effects | Not reported. None of the included studies assessed harms arising during the LED intervention.Not reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Non‐surgical adjunctive interventions for accelerating tooth movement in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment
2023 · Cochrane All outcomes
2022-09Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.