Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

61 questions in 42 reviews · cluster CL0285

current versions
No studies 36 · 59%Ungraded 15 · 24.6%Very low 6 · 9.8%Low 4 · 6.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Intervention categories, outcome domains and clusters are a proposed key pending human validation. Clear all filters

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Antioxidants (lycopene, curcumin, Oxitard) vs Placebo or no active treatment
Direct costs · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
The trials did not measure costs.0 studiesNo studies
Light vibrational forces (LVF) vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment (placebo or no adjunct)
Cost of treatment · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances
Non‐surgical adjunctive interventions for accelerating tooth movement in patients undergoing orthodontic… (2023) · Cochrane
Cost of treatment was not investigated in any of the included studies.NRNo studies
Professional oral care vs Usual oral care
Change in data on economics and quality of life · Residents of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities · 24 months
Oral care measures for preventing nursing home‐acquired pneumonia (2022) · Cochrane
MD 1.5 [0.32, 2.68]1 study · 322 participantsUngraded
Antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedure vs No antibiotic prophylaxis or placebo
Cost implications of antibiotic provision · Adults or children at increased risk of bacterial endocarditis (pre-existing cardiac condition) undergoing an invasive…
Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing bacterial endocarditis following dental procedures (2022) · Cochrane
The study did not provide any data on mortality, adverse events requiring hospitalisation, adverse effects of antibiotics or cost implications of treatment.0 studiesNo studies
Traditional screening (referral card given if the inspecting dentist judges the child needs to see a dentist) vs No screening
Cost effectiveness · School children (aged 4 to 15 years), primary and secondary schools in the UK and India
School dental screening programmes for oral health (2022) · Cochrane
As none of the studies reported cost-effectiveness, we could not assess the cost-benefit aspect of school dental screening.0 studiesNo studies
Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs No active intervention/usual care
Cost implications · People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age · 3-4 months
Treatment of periodontitis for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus (2022) · Cochrane
Included studies did not report cost data. A brief economic commentary drew on four external economic evaluations (Smits 2020, Nasseh 2017, Choi 2020, Soloweij-Wedderburn 2017) suggesting potential cost…0 studiesNo studies
Rubber dam isolation and moisture control (alone or with saliva aspiration) vs Cotton rolls (with or without saliva aspiration)
Costs: direct cost of treatment · Dental patients undergoing direct or indirect restorative treatment (no age or gender restriction)
Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Selective carious tissue removal (selective excavation, SE) vs Stepwise carious tissue removal (SW)
Efficiency, costs or cost-effectiveness · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious… · Permanent and primary dentition
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions (2021) · Cochrane
Cost-effectiveness reported narratively: SE found more cost-effective than SW in permanent (Labib 2019) and primary teeth (Elhennawy 2021); not GRADE-rated.2 studiesUngraded
Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction vs Single primary (canine) tooth extraction
Costs / cost-effectiveness · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for… (2021) · Cochrane
The studies did not report cost-effectiveness.0 studiesNo studies
Rubber dam isolation vs Isolite system
Costs: operation/chair time · Dental patients undergoing restorative treatment (no age or gender restriction) · Pit and fissure sealing (permanent molars)
Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients (2021) · Cochrane
MD 9.36 [8.42, 10.30]1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Rubber dam isolation and moisture control (alone or with saliva aspiration) vs Cotton rolls (with or without saliva aspiration)
Costs: treatment/operation time · Dental patients undergoing direct or indirect restorative treatment (no age or gender restriction) · NCCL composite (Loguercio); fissure sealing (Ammann, narrative)
Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients (2021) · Cochrane
MD -0.40 [-2.26, 1.46]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Rubber dam isolation vs Isolite system
Costs: direct cost of treatment · Dental patients undergoing restorative treatment (no age or gender restriction)
Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Extraction of the primary (baby) canine (single primary tooth extraction) vs No extraction (non-intervention control)
Costs / cost-effectiveness · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for… (2021) · Cochrane
The study did not report cost-effectiveness.0 studiesNo studies
Clinical examination with risk-based recall vs Clinical examination with 24-month recall
Cost (healthcare-system perspective): total cost per patient (GBP) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders) · 4 years
Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients (2020) · Cochrane
MD 17.00 [-14.34, 48.34]1 study · 404 participantsUngraded
Any method, procedure or policy to reduce contaminated aerosols in dental clinics vs Any other method, no treatment or combination of methods
Costs for the interventions used · Dental healthcare providers (dentist, dental surgery assistant, dental hygienist, dental technologist, dental…
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Clinical examination with 24-month recall vs Clinical examination with 6-month recall
Cost (patient perspective): total cost per patient (GBP) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders) · 4 years
Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients (2020) · Cochrane
MD -53.00 [-76.91, -29.09]1 study · 375 participantsUngraded
Clinical examination with risk-based recall vs Clinical examination with 6-month recall
Cost (healthcare-system perspective): total cost per patient (GBP) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders) · 4 years
Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients (2020) · Cochrane
MD 13.77 [-1.56, 29.11]1 study · 2006 participantsUngraded
Clinical examination with risk-based recall vs Clinical examination with 6-month recall
Cost (patient perspective): total cost per patient (GBP) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders) · 4 years
Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients (2020) · Cochrane
MD -9.49 [-23.05, 4.07]1 study · 1944 participantsUngraded
Clinical examination with 24-month recall vs Clinical examination with 6-month recall
Cost (healthcare-system perspective): total cost per patient (GBP) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders) · 4 years
Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients (2020) · Cochrane
MD -16.00 [-51.76, 19.76]1 study · 404 participantsUngraded
Clinical examination with risk-based recall vs Clinical examination with 24-month recall
Cost (patient perspective): total cost per patient (GBP) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders) · 4 years
Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients (2020) · Cochrane
MD 34.00 [9.78, 58.22]1 study · 375 participantsUngraded
Routine scale and polish every 6 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months
Costs (NHS perspective, GBP) · Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental…
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults (2018) · Cochrane
MD -7.62 [-28.39, 13.15]1 study · 556 participantsVery low
Ball (stud) attachment system vs Magnetic attachment system
Cost of prosthodontic maintenance (medium term) · Edentulous adults receiving mandibular implant overdentures (opposing conventional complete maxillary dentures) · Medium term (3 to 5 years)
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws (2018) · Cochrane
MD -247.37 [-346.32, -148.42]1 study · 69 participantsVery low
Planned, regular routine scale and polish (6-monthly; 12-monthly parallel) vs No scheduled scale and polish treatment
Costs (NHS perspective, GBP) · Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental… · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.52 [-18.10, 19.14]1 study · 554 participantsVery low
Ball (stud) attachment system vs Bar attachment system
Cost (treatment time and/or material costs) · Edentulous adults receiving mandibular implant overdentures (opposing conventional complete maxillary dentures)
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws (2018) · Cochrane
Walton 2002 reported costs but the data could not be used due to failure to report means and standard deviations and only providing the median of the costs.1 studyUngraded
Ball (stud) attachment system vs Telescopic attachment system
Cost (treatment time and/or material costs) · Edentulous adults receiving mandibular implant overdentures (opposing conventional complete maxillary dentures)
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA
Economic net benefits (cost effectiveness) · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Ramsay 2018 reported economic net benefits of OHA; measured, not synthesised or GRADE-rated.1 studyUngraded
Any surgical or non-surgical technique or material used for the treatment of post-extraction bleeding vs Another active intervention, placebo, or no treatment
Treatment-associated average cost · People of any age and either gender with post-extraction bleeding, regardless of type of teeth (anterior or posterior,…
Interventions for treating post‐extraction bleeding (2018) · Cochrane
No data are available as no RCTs have been conducted on interventions to treat post-extraction bleeding0 studiesNo studies
Routine scale and polish provided by a dentist vs Routine scale and polish provided by a dental care professional (dental therapist or hygienist)
Costs (NHS perspective) · Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental…
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Resorbable (bioresorbable) plates or screws for fixation vs Titanium plates or screws for fixation
Costs (fixation materials, hospital bed days, retreatment) · Adults (>16 years old) undergoing orthognathic surgery · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery (2017) · Cochrane
None of the studies reported on the cost incurred in the treatment.0 studiesNo studies
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Cost (mean per-patient supportive care costs) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
Mean per-patient supportive care costs lower with amifostine (USD 4401) than control (USD 5873); P = 0.02 (Buntzel 1998 / Bennett 2001)1 study · 28 participantsUngraded
Preoperative analgesics (analgesics given before dental treatment) vs Placebo or no analgesics
Cost · Children and adolescents aged up to 17 years having dental treatment (orthodontic treatment, fillings, pulp treatment,…
Preoperative analgesics for additional pain relief in children and adolescents having dental treatment (2016) · Cochrane
None of the included studies reported cost. PUB3: 'The [three/four] studies did not measure ... cost or completion of treatment.'0 studiesNo studies
Any experimental intervention (surgical or non-surgical) vs None (placebo or no treatment)
Health economic measures · People of any age and either sex, in any setting, with BRONJ; bisphosphonate exposure past or current; includes people…
Interventions for treating bisphosphonate‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Oral appliance or functional orthopaedic appliance vs Placebo or no treatment
Economic evaluation: costs · Children with obstructive sleep apnoea (aged 15 years or younger)
Oral appliances and functional orthopaedic appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea in children (2016) · Cochrane
The included study did not assess this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Direct and indirect costs to participants and health services · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
No included studies addressed direct and indirect costs to participants and health services (review-wide gap).0 studiesNo studies
Maxillary sinus lift (augmentation) with long implants vs Short implants (5 to 8.5 mm) without sinus augmentation
Treatment costs · Patients with missing teeth and an atrophic posterior maxilla, with residual bone height between 4 and 9 mm below the…
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane
Treatment costs: no trials reported this outcome (extrapolated by the review authors). Additional costs were associated with the long-implant + augmentation group (extra surgery, biomaterial, barrier, hospitalisation…0 studiesNo studies
Dual mini-screw implant vs Single mini-screw implant
Economic factors · Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment requiring surgical (mini-screw implant) anchorage
Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods (2014) · Cochrane
Economic factors were not reported in any of the studies comparing two types of surgical anchorage0 studiesNo studies
Frankel's function regulator-4 (FR-4) with lip-seal training vs No treatment
Economic evaluation (costs) · Children and adolescents (over 80% aged 16 years or younger at treatment start) with anterior open bite (lack of…
Orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment for anterior open bite in children (2014) · Cochrane
Outcome proposed in the review but not found in any included study. The review states: 'The other outcomes proposed in this review were not found: stability of anterior open bite correction; reduction of snoring; signs…0 studiesNo studies
Surgical anchorage (mini-screw or mid-palatal implant) vs Conventional anchorage (headgear, transpalatal/palatal arch, etc.)
Economic factors · Patients of any age undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and requiring anchorage (adolescents to…
Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods (2014) · Cochrane
No studies reported on economic evaluation0 studiesNo studies
Powered toothbrush (any mode of action) vs Manual toothbrush
Cost (relative cost of powered vs manual) · Individuals of any age with no reported disability that might affect toothbrushing (including people wearing…
Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health (2014) · Cochrane
None of the included trials reported on the relative costs of manual compared with powered toothbrushes.0 studiesNo studies
Self etching primers (one-step etchant and primer system) vs Conventional etchants (two-step etch and prime method using 37% phosphoric acid)
Cost of treatment · Children and adults with fixed orthodontic brackets bonded to incisors, canines and premolars
Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces (2013) · Cochrane
Cost of treatment: No studies assessed this outcome.NRNo studies
Any intervention to manage relapse: fixed options (labial braces, lingual braces, fixed lingual wire) or removable options (Hawley's retainer with spring elastomeric module, Bloore removable aligner, other Hawley's retainer modifications, Invisalign, Clearstep) vs Another such intervention or no active treatment; all interventions compared against each other in any combination
Cost-benefit consideration · Participants who previously underwent orthodontic treatment, with subsequent crowding (relapse) of the lower front…
Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment (2013) · Cochrane
No RCTs met the inclusion criteria for this review. After deduplication, the electronic searching identified 527 publications; after reviewing the titles and abstracts, none focused on interventions to correct the…0 studiesNo studies
Fee-for-service remuneration vs No specific intervention (control)
Healthcare costs: cost-effectiveness of fee-for-service vs control (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, reported as % change in outcome per GBP; currency year NR) · Dentists seeing children with erupted second permanent molars (Scotland, in areas representing the four most deprived… · 18 months
The effect of different methods of remuneration on the behaviour of primary care dentists (2013) · Cochrane
ICER 0.101 study · 68 participantsVery low
Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers vs No screening
Costs · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of… · 9 years (three cycles)
Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer (2013) · Cochrane
The costs associated with the screening programme were reported after three cycles (nine years) (Subramanian 2009) (Additional Table 8). The benefit produced by a screen was 269.31 life-years saved per 100,000 for all…1 studyUngraded
Capitation remuneration vs Fee-for-service remuneration
Healthcare costs: mean expenditure in GBP per 0- to 15-year-old (currency year NR) · Children (0- to 15-year-olds) undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices, in matched pairs of… · 1 year, Scottish community
The effect of different methods of remuneration on the behaviour of primary care dentists (2013) · Cochrane
MD 1.521 study · 276414 participantsLow
Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants in augmented maxillae
Cost-effectiveness · Participants with an atrophic maxilla who cannot be rehabilitated with conventional dental implants due to lack of… · At least 1 year in function
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the… (2013) · Cochrane
Results (Effects of interventions): we could not identify any eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs).0 studiesNo studies
Capitation remuneration vs Fee-for-service remuneration
Healthcare costs: mean expenditure in GBP per 0- to 15-year-old (currency year NR) · Children (0- to 15-year-olds) undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices, in matched pairs of… · 1 year, Northern urban community
The effect of different methods of remuneration on the behaviour of primary care dentists (2013) · Cochrane
MD 4.221 study · 276414 participantsLow
Capitation remuneration vs Fee-for-service remuneration
Healthcare costs: mean expenditure in GBP per 0- to 15-year-old (currency year NR) · Children (0- to 15-year-olds) undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices, in matched pairs of… · 1 year, Commuter suburb community
The effect of different methods of remuneration on the behaviour of primary care dentists (2013) · Cochrane
MD 6.181 study · 276414 participantsLow
Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy vs No HBO therapy
Cost effectiveness · Patients who have had radiotherapy and who have missing teeth that require replacement with osseointegrated dental…
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: hyperbaric oxygen therapy for irradiated patients who require… (2013) · Cochrane
Cost effectiveness data were not presented but it was possible to extrapolate this.0 studiesNo studies
Capitation remuneration vs Fee-for-service remuneration
Healthcare costs: mean expenditure in GBP per 0- to 15-year-old (currency year NR) · Children (0- to 15-year-olds) undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices, in matched pairs of… · 1 year, Rural community
The effect of different methods of remuneration on the behaviour of primary care dentists (2013) · Cochrane
MD 6.901 study · 276414 participantsLow
Alternative alloy FDP (e.g., Ceramalloy II / base-metal / palladium-silver) vs High-gold content control alloy FDP (Olympia)
Laboratory cost per unit · Patients receiving crowns and FDPs; split-mouth, 10-year · 10 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
Gold costs significantly higher: USD 89 per unit for gold compared to USD 53 for palladium-silver alloy and USD 37 for base-metal alloy1 studyUngraded