Cochrane · intervention · CD005516
Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces
Hu, H, Li, C, Li, F, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
9
current version
GRADE rated
1
No studies
4
Included studies
13
as reported
No studies 4 · 44.4%Ungraded 4 · 44.4%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 11.1%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Review question
| Element | Planned (methods) | Found (results) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | Participants, both children and adults, with fixed orthodontic brackets attached to their incisors, canines and premolars; excluded individuals with a cleft lip or palate or both, or with other craniofacial deformities/syndromes, and those with hypoplastic or fluorotic teeth | 417 participants with 7184 teeth/brackets; age ranged from 11 to 36 years, most participants were teenagers |
| Intervention | Any kind of etching materials and techniques used in the intervention group (e.g. self etching primers) | Self etching primers (n=11); Transbond Plus SEP (n=10); Ideal 1 SEP (n=1); Transbond Plus SEP as index arm in SEP-versus-SEP comparisons (n=2) |
| Comparison | Different etching materials, times and acid concentrations, or an alternative etching technique in the control group | Conventional etchants (n=11); 37% phosphoric acid (n=11); Clearfil Protect Bond SEP (n=1); First Step SEP (n=1) |
| Outcomes | Primary: bond failure rate of braces (rate at which braces fall off the teeth during treatment). Secondary: presence or absence of decay (decalcification) associated with or around the etching field; participant satisfaction; cost of treatment | Bond failure rate (n=12); presence or absence of decay (decalcification) (n=2) |
| Study designs | Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different etching materials or different etching techniques, including split-mouth trials using quadrants (even if contralateral quadrants receive the same intervention) but not those randomizing individual teeth or using alternate teeth | Split-mouth design (n=10); parallel design (n=3); five studies (split-mouth n=3, parallel n=2) pooled in the meta-analysis |
| Timing | Not specified | Follow-up ranged from 5 to 37 months |
Search date: 2013-03. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE via OVID; EMBASE via OVID; WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov); Chinese Biomedical Literature…
Questions and results
Show all 2 versionsDifferent etching materials (phosphoric acid, polyacrylic acid, maleic acid, etc.), acid concentrations or etching times vs An alternative etching material, concentration or etching time
Population: Children and adults with fixed orthodontic brackets bonded to incisors, canines and premolars
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome NR | We identified no eligible trial that examined the effects of conventional etchants with respect to different etching concentrations or etching times for the bonding of fixed orthodontic appliances. No eligible RCTs… | NR | No studies |
Self etching primers (one-step etchant and primer system) vs Conventional etchants (two-step etch and prime method using 37% phosphoric acid)
Population: Children and adults with fixed orthodontic brackets bonded to incisors, canines and premolars
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Bond failure rate 5 to 37 months | RR 1.14 [0.75, 1.73] 27 [-49, 143] more per 1000 | 5 studies · 221 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Damage to the teeth | Damage to the teeth: No studies assessed this outcome. | NR | No studies |
Cost of treatment | Cost of treatment: No studies assessed this outcome. | NR | No studies |
Participant satisfaction | Participant satisfaction: No studies assessed this outcome. | NR | No studies |
Decay (decalcification) associated with or around the etching field | Decay (decalcification) associated with or around the etching field: Only one study (Ghiz 2009) assessed this outcome but data were reported at the tooth level rather than at the participant level and therefore was not… | 1 study · 25 participants | Ungraded |
Transbond Plus self etching primer (3M Unitek) vs Clearfil Protect Bond self etching primer (Kuraray Medical)
Population: Children and adults with fixed orthodontic brackets bonded to incisors, canines and premolars
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Bond failure rate | Self etching primers versus self etching primers: Two split-mouth studies compared two different SEPs (Noble 2006; Paschos 2009). The failure rates were reported at tooth level rather than at participant level. We… | 1 study | Ungraded |
Decay (decalcification) associated with or around the etching field | Decalcification outcomes in Paschos 2009 were reported at tooth level rather than at participant level; the evidence was insufficient to conclude whether or not there is a difference in decalcification between the… | 1 study | Ungraded |
Transbond Plus self etching primer (3M Unitek) vs First Step self etching primer (Reliance Orthodontic Products)
Population: Children and adults with fixed orthodontic brackets bonded to incisors, canines and premolars
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Bond failure rate | Noble 2006 (split-mouth) compared Transbond Plus versus First Step SEP; the bond failure rate was reported at tooth level rather than at participant level and was not amenable to analysis; the evidence was insufficient… | 1 study | Ungraded |