Cochrane · intervention · CD006204

Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery

Agnihotry, A, Fedorowicz, Z, Nasser, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Oral HealthOral and maxillofacial surgery3 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
19
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
6
Included studies
2
as reported
No studies 6 · 31.6%Ungraded 8 · 42.1%Very low 5 · 26.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (>16 years old) undergoing orthognathic surgery; fracture patients excluded103 participants across 2 RCTs. Cheung 2004 (Hong Kong, China): 60 adults (18 male, 42 female), 16 to 37 years (mean 22.9), with dentofacial deformities. Weidner 2005 (Germany): 43 of 60 adults (27 female, 16 male) undergoing mandibular setback/advancement.
InterventionBioresorbable (resorbable) plates or screws or bothResorbable plates (BiosorbFX self-reinforced poly-L/DL lactic acid copolymer) (n=30); Resorbable screws (Isosorb, biodegradable lactopolymer) (n=23)
ComparisonTitanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or bothTitanium plates (Compact 2.0 pure titanium plating system) (n=30); Titanium screws (Stryker-Leibinger) (n=20)
OutcomesNeed for retreatment or replacement of fixation; Status of occlusion (ANB/Angle's/Wits); Facial appearance and profile; Immediate postoperative swelling; Degree of function postoperatively; Satisfactory radiographic appearance; Postoperative pain (VAS); Analgesic medication used; Quality of life; Patient satisfaction; Costs; Adverse effects (insufficient fixation, re-operation/revision, plate exposure, dislocation, non-union, superficial/deep wound infection, sinus tract, wound dehiscence, blood loss, thromboembolic complications, any medical complication, persistent pain, loss of sensation/function, foreign body/inflammatory reaction, post-traumatic dystrophy)Need for retreatment/replacement of fixation (n=60); Clinical stability of osteotomy segments (n=60); Status of occlusion/ANB (n=43); Immediate postoperative swelling (n=60); Postoperative pain immediate recovery period (n=60); Postoperative chronic or lasting pain (n=60); Patient satisfaction (n=60); Plate exposure (n=60); Superficial and deep wound infection (n=60); Occurrence of sinus tract (n=60); Wound dehiscence (n=60); Re-operation and revision rate/plate removal (n=60)
Study designsRandomised controlled trials (RCTs)2 RCTs (Cheung 2004, Weidner 2005), both at high overall risk of bias (high risk of performance and detection bias; blinding not feasible as metal is easily distinguished from resorbable plates)
TimingFollow-up up to 3 years postoperativelyCheung 2004 followed up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months; Weidner 2005 at six intervals from before orthodontic treatment to 15 months postoperatively

Search date: 2017-01. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov; World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform

Questions and results

Show all 3 versions

Resorbable (bioresorbable) plates or screws for fixation vs Titanium plates or screws for fixation

Population: Adults (>16 years old) undergoing orthognathic surgery
19 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Exposure of the plate (adverse effect)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
Both titanium and resorbable groups experienced two plate exposures which occurred between the third and ninth month, with plate exposure rates of 1.02% for the titanium group and 1.21% for the resorbable group. All…1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Wound dehiscence (adverse effect)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
Three patients (10%) in the titanium group and two patients (6.7%) in the resorbable group presented with wound dehiscence. One patient in each group with dehisced wounds became infected; all non-infected wounds closed…1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Clinical stability of osteotomy segments (VAS 0 to 10)
0 to 24 months (by period)
Clinical stability of osteotomy segments (Cheung 2004), self-assessed on a VAS (0=very mobile, 10=no mobility) by postoperative period, titanium vs resorbable mean (SD): 0 to 2 weeks 8.10 (1.79) vs 8.47 (2.18), P=0.48;…1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Patient satisfaction (VAS 0 to 10)
4 to 6 months
MD 0.17 [-0.67, 1.01]1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Facial appearance and profile
Up to 3 years postoperatively
No data available for this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Need for retreatment or replacement of fixation due to failure of the fixation
Mean 1 year
SoF row (Resorbable plates compared to titanium plates for stabilization after orthognathic surgery). Need for retreatment or replacement of fixation due to failure of the fixation (plates failed or removed in each…1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Postoperative chronic or lasting pain (wound discomfort) at 4 to 6 months (VAS 0 to 10)
4 to 6 months
MD -0.77 [-1.58, 0.04]1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Analgesic medication used (type, dose, frequency)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
No data available for this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Occurrence of sinus tract (adverse effect)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
Five patients (three in the titanium group and two in the resorbable group) developed a non-infected sinus tract. The sinus tracts arose earlier in the titanium group (sixth week) than in the resorbable group (third…1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Postoperative pain during the immediate recovery period (VAS 0 to 10)
2 weeks (immediate recovery period)
MD -0.77 [-1.92, 0.38]1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Costs (fixation materials, hospital bed days, retreatment)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
None of the studies reported on the cost incurred in the treatment.0 studiesNo studies
Re-operation and revision rate / plate removal (adverse effect)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
Plate removal rates were 1.53% (3/196) of the titanium plates and 3.63% (6/165) of the resorbable ones. Out of a total of nine, two in each group were removed because of plate exposure, one patient in the titanium and…1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Status of occlusion (e.g. ANB, Angle's classification, Wits analysis)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
Weidner 2005 provided analyses of mean changes in ANB from scanned radiographs. The ANB data were incomplete for many of the five time periods and were reported as 'grad' rather than the conventionally accepted…1 study · 43 participantsUngraded
Immediate postoperative swelling (assessed by photography or digital morphometry)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
Though Cheung 2004 reported the presence of postoperative swelling, it was only noted in conjunction with infection and pus discharge; assessment of this outcome did not include the use of photography or digital…1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Quality of life
Up to 3 years postoperatively
None of the included studies reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Adverse effects (composite: plate exposure, wound infection, sinus tract, wound dehiscence, plate removal)
Up to 24 months postoperatively
SoF row. Adverse effects; 60 participants (1 RCT); Quality of the evidence (GRADE): VERY LOW. Exposure of the plate: both titanium and resorbable groups experienced 2 plate exposures which occurred between the third…1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness
Superficial and deep wound infection (adverse effect)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
The trialists did not differentiate between superficial and deep wound infection. Three (10%) of the patients in each group developed infections accounting for six plates: 3/196 (1.53%) in the titanium group and 3/165…1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Degree of function postoperatively (mastication, swallowing, speech)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
No data available for this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Satisfactory radiographic appearance (cephalometric radiographs)
Up to 3 years postoperatively
No data available for this outcome.0 studiesNo studies