Intervention not reported
Blood‐feeding success (unwashed nets) · adults and childen living in malaria‐endemic areas, Anopheles gambiae complex or Anopheles funestus group
The intervention leads to lower blood‐feeding success (unwashed nets) (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Blood‐feeding success (washed nets) · adults and childen living in malaria‐endemic areas, Anopheles gambiae complex or Anopheles funestus group
The intervention leads to lower blood‐feeding success (washed nets) (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mosquito mortality (unwashed nets) · Anopheles gambiae complex or Anopheles funestus group
The intervention probably leads to higher mosquito mortality (unwashed nets) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.68 [1.33, 2.11]
Studies not reported
Moderate
All‐cause mortality among participants · people being investigated for tuberculosis (TB)
Impact of Xpert MTB/RIF showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality among participants compared with smear microscopy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality at 6 months (subgroup) · people being investigated for tuberculosis (TB)
Impact of Xpert MTB/RIF showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality at 6 months (subgroup) compared with smear microscopy (moderate certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Successful treatment outcome in participants treated for tuberculosis · people being investigated for tuberculosis (TB)
Impact of Xpert MTB/RIF showed no clear difference in successful treatment outcome in participants treated for tuberculosis compared with smear microscopy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants who were treated for tuberculosis · people being investigated for tuberculosis (TB)
Impact of Xpert MTB/RIF showed no clear difference in proportion of participants who were treated for tuberculosis compared with smear microscopy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pre‐treatment loss to · people being investigated for tuberculosis (TB)
Impact of Xpert MTB/RIF probably leads to lower pre‐treatment loss to compared with smear microscopy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Treated participants with bacteriological confirmation of tuberculosis · people being investigated for tuberculosis (TB)
Impact of Xpert MTB/RIF probably leads to higher treated participants with bacteriological confirmation of tuberculosis compared with smear microscopy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical malaria incidence · people living in malaria‐endemic areas
It is very uncertain whether ivermectin changes incidence of clinical malaria compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
590 participants
Very low
Adverse events · people living in malaria‐endemic areas
It is very uncertain whether ivermectin changes adverse events compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.63 [1, 2.67]
2712 participants
Very low
All‐cause mortality · people with bloodstream infections
Rapid susceptibility methods showed no clear difference in mortality compared with standard methods versus placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mortality (subgroup genotypic) · people with bloodstream infections
Rapid susceptibility methods showed no clear difference in mortality (subgroup genotypic) compared with standard methods versus placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mortality (subgroup phenotypic) · people with bloodstream infections
Rapid susceptibility methods showed no clear difference in mortality (subgroup phenotypic) compared with standard methods versus placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mortality (with stewardship) · people with bloodstream infections
Rapid susceptibility methods showed no clear difference in mortality (with stewardship) compared with standard methods versus placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mortality (without stewardship) · people with bloodstream infections
Rapid susceptibility methods showed no clear difference in mortality (without stewardship) compared with standard methods versus placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to hospital discharge · people with bloodstream infections
1 finding from 1 review
Time‐to‐appropriate antibiotic · people with bloodstream infections
1 finding from 1 review
Death due to any cause · adults with mild to severe COVID‐19
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) showed no clear difference in death due to any cause compared with standard care or placebo (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Participants with any adverse events · people who have been exposed to SARS‐CoV‐2
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) probably leads to higher participants with any adverse events compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review