Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

48 questions · 48 findings · 14 reviews · Urology

No studies found 7 · 14.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 17 · 35.4%Low 15 · 31.3%Moderate 8 · 16.7%High 1 · 2.1%

Posterior reconstruction vs no posterior reconstruction

Serious adverse events · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer

Posterior reconstruction showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with no posterior reconstruction (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP

Serious adverse events · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer

It is very uncertain whether retzius‐sparing RALP changes serious adverse events compared with standard RALP (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Postoperative MMC‐EMDA with sequential BCG induction and maintenance vs postoperative BCG induction and maintenance therapy

Serious adverse events

It is very uncertain whether postoperative MMC‐EMDA with sequential BCG induction and maintenance changes serious adverse events compared with postoperative BCG induction and maintenance therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sorafenib vs pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sorafenib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review