Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

688 questions · 708 findings · 336 reviews

No studies found 374 · 52.8%GRADE not reported 21 · 3%Very low 110 · 15.5%Low 118 · 16.7%Moderate 62 · 8.8%High 23 · 3.2%

NB‐UVB vs PUVA

Health‐related quality of life ‐ not measured · atopic eczema

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

UVA1 vs PUVA

Health‐related quality of life ‐ not measured · atopic eczema

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

NB‐UVB vs placebo

Health‐related quality of life ‐ not measured · atopic eczema

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrus microstent vs iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent

Mean change in health‐related quality of life · people with open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cataract surgery with Hydrus microstent vs cataract surgery alone

Mean change in health‐related quality of life · people with cataracts and open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Dinutuximab‐containing immunotherapy vs usual care

Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · People with high‐risk neuroblastoma pre‐treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Methotrexate vs placebo

Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · psoriatic arthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life ‐ not measured · patients with acute gout

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐specialist‐led vs specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Health‐related quality of life, (at 12 months' · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colon, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, melanoma and oesophageal

Non‐specialist‐led showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life, (at 12 months' compared with specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review